But I was discussing this with Governor NeverAgain before you moved on with the amendment. That's why I didn't put it up.
Now Gov. NeverAgain has some good points on why the penny should stay such as the following (a few of his strongest points, IMO):
-
Rounding: For example, when you take away the penny, you won't see prices like $1.99 anymore. Instead, you may see $3.95 or $4.00. However, as we all know, businesses are more likely to charge $4.00 to get some of that extra guap. It could hurt, although it would probably be insignificant.
-
Zinc Industry: Like Governor NeverAgain said, there would be a loss of jobs if we don't include the penny. He pretty much explained it too.
But here are some pretty good counterarguments:
-
The cost of making the penny: During the year of 2016, the penny's cost to produced rose to 1.5 cents which is
actually costs more than its own worth.
-
Bad for the environment: Pennies are made of mostly zinc. Actually more than 97% zinc. 2.5% is metal content. According to the
Enviromental Protection Agency, zinc ores contain anywhere from 3-11% metallic zinc. Zinc contains other metals that are actually toxic such as cadmium and lead. Those metals in the mines contaminate the soil, plant life, and water. A lot of energy is also required. You have to extract the energy from the ore, roll it out and stamp onto the coins, and then transport those coins to the banks.
DesignLife-Cycle.org, a site created by students of the University of California, calculated that just transporting the pennies to the banks - not even including any other stages of production - actually releases 1.5 million metric tons of carbon dioxide (CO2) into the atmosphere every year.