MT-AL: Rob Quist (D) vs. Greg Gianforte (R) vs. Mark Wicks (L), May 25 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 06, 2024, 10:57:53 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  MT-AL: Rob Quist (D) vs. Greg Gianforte (R) vs. Mark Wicks (L), May 25 (search mode)
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: MT-AL: Rob Quist (D) vs. Greg Gianforte (R) vs. Mark Wicks (L), May 25  (Read 240286 times)
Angrie
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 448


« Reply #25 on: May 25, 2017, 09:55:15 PM »

have we actually counted any election day vote though?

Some people say that it is all early vote. No idea how they know that though, it is not clear like in most other states.
Logged
Angrie
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 448


« Reply #26 on: May 25, 2017, 09:57:35 PM »

Wibaux county is 100% in. Gianforte is at 79% there, was 70% for him in 2016. It is a very small 1 precinct rural county.
Logged
Angrie
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 448


« Reply #27 on: May 25, 2017, 10:13:01 PM »

Quist won election day vote in yellowstone by 7%

Isn't that like 27 points better than the early vote was?
Logged
Angrie
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 448


« Reply #28 on: May 25, 2017, 10:16:23 PM »


some unverified twitter account named sammy snickers.

Prob baloney

I guess unsubstantiated twitter rumors are Quist's only real hope at this point.
Logged
Angrie
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 448


« Reply #29 on: May 25, 2017, 10:23:34 PM »

A reminder that the DCCC spent a tenth on this race what they've spent in GA-6 so far.

Maybe cause they knew it really wasn't winnable?

Bullock won the state against Gianforte as Clinton lost by 20 points. Jon Tester got elected twice here.

1) Those two are more moderate than Quist

2) The media markets aren't even comparable

3) Hillary did better in GA-6 than MT-AL by about eighty miles.

Not every seat deserves equal funding. Sorry. Georgia-6 was always, always more winnable than MT-AL.

Why do Democrats keep saying this about seats they lose by a whisker (MT, KS-4)?

Because Democrats really really like to get their hopes up and then get them quashed. It happens with basically every single election.
Logged
Angrie
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 448


« Reply #30 on: May 25, 2017, 10:24:49 PM »

Remember, Bullock was an incumbent who had 60+ approval ratings barely coasted by-- only won by 4 points. Otherwise he would have been toast.

So you are saying this is a pretty good performance, and the Democrats ought to nominate Berniecrats for everything. Message received!
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 10 queries.