McCaskill is a fanstatic candidate wish the dems would give her money. (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 08, 2024, 04:37:15 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  McCaskill is a fanstatic candidate wish the dems would give her money. (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: McCaskill is a fanstatic candidate wish the dems would give her money.  (Read 2138 times)
MissCatholic
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,424


« on: July 26, 2006, 09:34:59 AM »

http://mydd.com/story/2006/7/17/12945/1070

you cant be helped but impressed with these answers.
Logged
MissCatholic
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,424


« Reply #1 on: July 26, 2006, 11:36:54 AM »

No you can't be anything but impressed with her answers.  I really want McCaskill to win; I am most passionate about her campaign more than any other Democratic candidate in this cycle.  With her attention to rural voters in Missouri and Talent's lacklustre record I believe she can win.

Talents passion for increasing healthcare in America has been rewarded by the drug companies; $5m - thats the difference between McCaskill and Talent.

SCUMBAG!!!!!!!!!!!
Logged
MissCatholic
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,424


« Reply #2 on: July 26, 2006, 11:39:24 AM »

The Democrats should be sending her money instead of wasting it in Connecticut, Virginia and Arizona.

Isnt pederson self-funded?
Logged
MissCatholic
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,424


« Reply #3 on: July 26, 2006, 11:43:25 AM »

The Democrats should be sending her money instead of wasting it in Connecticut, Virginia and Arizona.

Isnt pederson self-funded?

I forgot about that (although I'm sure he accepts donations).  I was just trying to think of races that are pretty much unwinnable that the Democrats think they can still pick up.  Perhaps Nevada would have been a better example.

i think its because the DNC gave loads of cash in 2005 to Missouri hence shes on her own nad she doesnt need the name recognition.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 12 queries.