Which side is approaching the issue of judicial filibuster correctly? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 10, 2024, 04:29:44 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Which side is approaching the issue of judicial filibuster correctly? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Which side is approaching the issue of judicial filibuster correctly?
#1
Moderates
#2
Democrats
#3
Republicans
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results


Author Topic: Which side is approaching the issue of judicial filibuster correctly?  (Read 4630 times)
MissCatholic
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,424


« on: May 23, 2005, 09:22:10 AM »

A minority must have some sort of rights. If a president gets 100% of the vote but his party only has 44 senators. then the majority house can force decisions on the president that he doesnt want.

Strem cell research will put bush in a tight spot. highlighing the growing theocracy in america.
Logged
MissCatholic
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,424


« Reply #1 on: May 23, 2005, 10:09:46 AM »

I understand what your suggesting but this is not what the issue is about. The Republicans SAY they will only use it for judicial nominees but these nominees are extreme.

Terri Schiavo was convicted to die by Reagan judges. Yet the religious right blamed the courts for her death. They support the end to the filibuster because they think the judges that are doing this are liberal judges. They are telling stories.

The republicans that are trying to find a way to negiotiate are those that have been in the senate along tim or they live in a national democratic state.
Logged
MissCatholic
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,424


« Reply #2 on: May 23, 2005, 10:53:24 AM »

If any Republican stands up to the religious right the moment they are up for re-electino they will have to run agaisnt a Pat Robertson Republican - ask Arlen Spector.

Republicans have to sit with Robertson or they will get another nutty to replace him. Notice the number of republicans writing books saying thatits our party too.
Logged
MissCatholic
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,424


« Reply #3 on: May 23, 2005, 10:56:53 AM »

Yes i`m saying that republicans are scared of Pat Robertson as if they dont vote how he would vote then they will find republicans like yourself to oust them.

You must be a Robertson disciple and follow the party line. Ask RickSantorum represents PA, but thinks he represents Texas.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 14 queries.