Was Judas' "betrayal" a mistranslation? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 26, 2024, 09:40:16 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Religion & Philosophy (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  Was Judas' "betrayal" a mistranslation? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Was Judas' "betrayal" a mistranslation?  (Read 2163 times)
Bleach Blonde Bad Built Butch Bodies for Biden
Just Passion Through
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,649
Norway


P P P

« on: January 09, 2017, 10:21:36 AM »

Last night I was watching a documentary series about untold "secrets" of the Bible.  Something that caught my attention is one scholar's belief that the word "betrayal" is a mistranslation of the word "paradidomi," which more accurately translates to simply "hand over."  If this is true, it would follow that Judas, rather than betray Jesus, likely worked with him to make certain that Jesus would be crucified in order to facilitate God's plan for humanity.  However, this theory does not account for the word translated as "traitor" in Luke 6:16, which could have been a mistake by the author of Luke or a copyist's error.

I googled William Klassen's theory for more information, but couldn't find much discussion over it or concurrence by a reputable source.  Is there any plausibility to this claim?
Logged
Bleach Blonde Bad Built Butch Bodies for Biden
Just Passion Through
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,649
Norway


P P P

« Reply #1 on: January 09, 2017, 02:04:08 PM »

Have you read "Three Versions of Judas"?

No.
Logged
Bleach Blonde Bad Built Butch Bodies for Biden
Just Passion Through
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,649
Norway


P P P

« Reply #2 on: January 10, 2017, 07:12:34 PM »

Judas's behavior (in the canonical texts) before and after the event isn't consistent with Jesus having colluded in it.

That was one of my gripes with his theory, actually.  That and the fact that no serious Biblical scholar I know of has acknowledged let alone considered it.

Last night I was watching a documentary series about untold "secrets" of the Bible.

I'm no scholar of Greek, but the way the documentary presents itself makes me skeptical they're providing anything useful or profound. It kind of sounds like those silly ancient aliens docs on the History channel.

Yeah, the show very much presents itself as sort of a #hottake clip series.  It's not from the History Channel, though the format is reminiscent of the History Channel prior to its mid-2000s devolution.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

One thing we Westerners often forget is that the early Church operated mostly in Greek. Most of the attendees at the Council of Nicea were Greek speakers for example, with Latin speakers. The Greek Christians obviously can't mistranslate when reading words written in their own language, so the issue would have to be a question of misunderstanding the overall text. But if that's the case...
[/quote]

That's important to have in mind.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 12 queries.