CT a Tossup with Romney: PPP (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 20, 2024, 08:18:28 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  CT a Tossup with Romney: PPP (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: CT a Tossup with Romney: PPP  (Read 3930 times)
Bleach Blonde Bad Built Butch Bodies for Biden
Just Passion Through
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,609
Norway


P P P

« on: September 30, 2011, 02:30:04 PM »


What?  Now I wonder what the point is in polling for presidential elections, at all.  That's way off, even for Rasmussen.
Logged
Bleach Blonde Bad Built Butch Bodies for Biden
Just Passion Through
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,609
Norway


P P P

« Reply #1 on: September 30, 2011, 02:55:21 PM »

I wonder how many of the 20% of Democrats disapproving are disappointed liberals.
As a Connecticut Democrat somewhat in that 20%, I can tell ya.  100%.
Logged
Bleach Blonde Bad Built Butch Bodies for Biden
Just Passion Through
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,609
Norway


P P P

« Reply #2 on: September 30, 2011, 03:19:57 PM »

Also, I think Romney have a serious shot in Massachusetts.
Nah.
Logged
Bleach Blonde Bad Built Butch Bodies for Biden
Just Passion Through
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,609
Norway


P P P

« Reply #3 on: September 30, 2011, 04:21:19 PM »

It is funny how even PPP-polls are discarded as outliers when they show the Republicans winning. However, when the Democrats are winning then PPP is considered a very reliable pollster.
Romney has about as much of a chance winning Connecticut as Obama winning Georgia.
Logged
Bleach Blonde Bad Built Butch Bodies for Biden
Just Passion Through
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,609
Norway


P P P

« Reply #4 on: October 02, 2011, 10:42:40 PM »

It's hard to say how the GOP would do in CT with a well-behaved nominee. They haven't had one in so long.

Exactly, which is why Romney's numbers in the state should be taken seriously. 2012 could be the opportunity for Republicans to significantly gain a presence on the electoral map again. The last comfortable win for them was all the way back in 1988. Remember Democrats went through a period from roughly 1972 to 1992 where they were either in the wilderness in presidential elections, or couldn't manage to break 300. Yet, Clinton came along and significantly altered the map for them, and arguably gave them an electoral vote advantage they have maintained, and will likely lose come 2012.

Clinton may have helped Democrats in the electoral college, but he destroyed them at the Congressional and local level, which Obama made even worse
Most presidents do that to their party.  The only reason why Carter didn't see his party lose control of Congress was because he enjoyed very large majorities, especially in the House.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 14 queries.