The Hofoid House of Absurd & Ignorant Posts VII

[RussFeingoldWasRobbed]

Will the deplorables vote for a black person, no matter his political positions? Many fake Democrats voted for Bernard because of his white maleness over Hillary Clinton, who just happened to be a accomplished women. The whiteness of states like Wisconsin and Iowa will help Bernard secure a victory, as much as it pains me to say.

[RussFeingoldWasRobbed]

http://www.shakesville.com/2015/07/looking-for-bernie-part-1-sanders-72.html

A sane criticism of sanders(in the very twitter thread you linked to).

The Bernie campaign called that 45 year old essay stupid.

And Roy Moore said he never touched those girls, so I guess everything is OK.

False equivalency much?

[RussFeingoldWasRobbed]

I think they should for simple reasons:

It is morally wrong to force someone to assume responsibility for a child they did not want; by allowing either parent to put the child up for adoption without permission from the other parent; this situation is avoided.

A child is better off if they have 2 adults who wanted them as opposed to just 1; by putting the child up for adoption; every child is guaranteed that there will be 2 adults who appreciate them as opposed to just 1 adult.

Currently, there are far more couples who want to adopt a child; than there are children put up for adoption; by increasing the pool of children put up for adoption; fewer couples who want to adopt a child are left unable to do so.

If a child is taken away from someone who wanted it under such a system; no one is preventing them from trying to find a different partner who would be more interested in having a child with them; giving them a simple way to try again.

[RussFeingoldWasRobbed]

In the ongoing Russia investigation, Bernie Sanders has said that he unwilling know the Russians were targeting Hillary Clinton campaign. What he hasn't acknowledged is the backing he received from Vladimir Putin and co. Russian Facebook memes showed a shirtless geriatric warning primary voters not to support Hillary Clinton. Ted Devine, one of Bernie campaign mangers, has been in contact with the Russians during the lead up of the election. Bernie responses resemble the the man who was ultimately put into Oval Office by the same cronies.


Will this scandal doom Bernie campaign if he decides to run in 2020?

[RussFeingoldWasRobbed]

Sherry doesn't support single payer or free college.

Thanks for making the case why she will be an excellent congresswoman.

[RussFeingoldWasRobbed]

I dont know what your obsession with beating down on rural voters is. Many of these guys have had the biggest swing towards Democrats. Its been the suburbs, the ones who voted for him by plugging their nose, and swung a bit Clinton, that have been the biggest obstacle. The fact that we are competitive in MT, and not in the GA suburbs show this.

Because VA-Gov, AL-Sen, PA-18, AZ-08, and OH-12 never happened apparently. And Comstock, Rothfus, Paulsen, Coffman, and Yoder are clearly in great shape for re-election.

what I said was true, the Ds have had the largest swings in rural areas. Suburbs, on the other hand, have had smaller swings, which is why we are focusing a lot of energy on Clinton won districts in Orange County, than in rural Trump districts like WV-03 or ME-02. Whereas a lot of energy from the national party, and fundraising, has gone to these areas, barely any has gone to rural areas, and we are doing much better. PA-18, a much more rural district, was able to get Lamb over the top, thanks to large turnout from Allegamy and a narrowing in the rurals, than OH-12, a   much more suburban area with a smaller PVI. Not to mention the swings seen in rural IL, districts 12 and 13, ommmmmm
I the small swings in suburban IL, in districts 06 and 14. M

You are also cherrypicking examples. The incumbents you named have been in D
 for a while now. Comstock survived the district going D+10 in 2016, and survived in 2014, 2012 as well. MN-03's Paulsen has survived 2008. NYT's poll literally calls Coffman "Battle Tested". These districts should have flipped long ago, and yet they didnt. Meanwhile, ME-02, MT-AL, KS-02, and other rural districts are suddenly competitive, making large swings. The rurals are just more elastic, and the suburbs have been where we have had to focus everything.

Edit: even in mostly suburban areas, the rurals have swung more.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/special-election-results/arizona/?utm_term=.90ad085578bc
I didnt even know this was the case in AZ-08...

Your right about CO-6 and MN-3 but KS-3 voted for McCain and Romney. Hillary only won by a poin