What if Hillary doesn't get a "Bernie Bounce"?

[Hermit For Peace]

.....

I have faith that this party is heading in a better direction, and I also understand the choices made in the past led us to a point where we had soul searching to do, but I'm not going to act it was all as simple as the party deciding one day it wants to be subservient to the 1%. The upside I see is that our generation is framed around the issues of inequality and special interest corruption, and the movements trying to enact reform and the constituencies to which they serve will eventually advance those issues once we have a governing majority again. I wish some people would have a little optimism here.

I just wanted to add that that's why I don't go for Bernie's "revolution." The thing is, we are always evolving as a country, and it's evolution that's important. In small increments that people can handle. It's just what happens naturally.

Bernie may be a catalyst of some sort, but we don't need Bernie to make something happen that is already going to happen as we evolve and grow and continue our forward thrust.

[Hermit For Peace]

Thanks for sharing what you figure to be your observations about Hillary Clinton's primaries voters having any sort of understanding why people aren't into Hillary but are strongly supportive of Bernie Sanders.

Perhaps you will also observe that when a candidate takes hundreds of thousands in money from Wall Street and financial institutions, they expect something in return which works to their advantage (and not to yours).

Did you watch the debate between Bernie and Hillary when he was asked to name just ONE instance where Hillary compromised her vote or her action because of Wall Street or big money's influence on her.

He couldn't come up with one instance at all.

So you see, you seem to be reading something into a situation that just isn't there.