No, I could not support it.
My principal bone is with Clause 2: If two states have instituted gay marriage, then I believe that under Comity they should be required to recognise one another's marriages.
Good point. I copied this out of a footnote of a law review article. Evidently they didn't think of that.
No. The opposition to gay marriage is not a matter so pressing nor a position whose support is so strong that it should be brought anywhere near the Constitution.
This amendment is entirely neutral towards gay marriage.