Alternate Federal Marriage Amendment (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 15, 2024, 07:18:14 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Constitution and Law (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  Alternate Federal Marriage Amendment (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Would you support this constitutional amendment?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 13

Author Topic: Alternate Federal Marriage Amendment  (Read 3193 times)
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

« on: November 23, 2005, 10:37:12 PM »

Section 1. Nothing in this Constitution shall be construed to require any institution of government in the United States to recognize as marriage, or grant any benefits or incidents of marriage to, any union except that of one man and one woman.

Section 2. No state shall be required by any federal law, or by any provision of this Constitution, to recognize the validity of any marriage except a marriage of one man and one woman.

Section 3. Nothing in this article shall be construed as an endorsement of any prior judicial interpretation of any provision of this Constitution.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

« Reply #1 on: November 23, 2005, 11:19:46 PM »

No, I could not support it.

My principal bone is with Clause 2: If two states have instituted gay marriage, then I believe that under Comity they should be required to recognise one another's marriages.

Good point. I copied this out of a footnote of a law review article. Evidently they didn't think of that.

No.  The opposition to gay marriage is not a matter so pressing nor a position whose support is so strong that it should be brought anywhere near the Constitution.

This amendment is entirely neutral towards gay marriage.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

« Reply #2 on: November 23, 2005, 11:47:06 PM »


I thought you supported states' rights.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

« Reply #3 on: November 25, 2005, 07:22:05 PM »

This amendment doesn't turn anything over to states. It actually just preserves the present law.

I guess you support judicial activism, and imperialism.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 14 queries.