Were slaves in the South justified in killing their owners?

[A18]

There were a few slave rebellions were slaves would escape, find weapons and then kill slaveowners and overseers.

I vote yes of course. I would have no problems killing anyone who in any way whatsoever supported slavery.

So you don't support the death penalty for raping and killing a nine year old girl, but you support the death penalty for simply supporting something. Your consistency is impressive.

[A18]

You said you would have no problem killing anyone who supported slavery in any way.

[A18]

Okay, so you support the death penalty then.

[A18]

You can't 'resist' and 'revolt' against someone who doesn't have authority over you.

[A18]

Slave owners don't need 'propping up.' Anyway, you're clearly too dumb to have a conversation with, since you keep switching the target.

I imagine the people shot would complain, as would everyone else with a brain.

[A18]

If you consider that 'propping up,' (which it's not) then you can't 'resist' and 'revolt' against people 'propping up' slave owners either.

In any event, you clearly support killing people who take no action against you at all just for having a particular viewpoint that was embraced by God in the Old Testament, and which existed for thousands of years, and yet oppose killing someone who rapped and killed a nine year old girl. Pretty dumb, but I guess no one takes you seriously anyway.

[A18]

Nat Turner was one of our first domestic terrorists. He killed innocent children in his Virginia uprising.

Good!

lol... that was actually pretty good