There is no right to privacy in the Constitution. Santorum is correct, and you are an idiot.
Amendment IV
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Amendment IX
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
And none of this establishes a right to general privacy; especially since the last two add absolutely nothing to the actual document.
Sorry, the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures has absolutely nothing to do with an anti-sodomy law, which is only enforced when a cop comes across the act with other intentions.
When you by association call me a bigot, it's personal, but I wasn't particularly serious.
I believe Santorum is against asinine court rulings that make sh**t up to strike down stupid laws just because they're ridiculous.
