Ossoff2028's Index of House District Partisanship (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 31, 2024, 07:53:06 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Ossoff2028's Index of House District Partisanship (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Ossoff2028's Index of House District Partisanship  (Read 3104 times)
Since I'm the mad scientist proclaimed by myself
omegascarlet
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,101


« on: July 11, 2017, 06:21:42 PM »

Taking into account house 2016 vote is problematic, as factors such as variations in the quality of the opposing candidate can wildly swing the seat(EG AZ-02 swinging 10 points R in 2016 because Heinz was a terrible candidate with effectively no campaign.) Seats won in waves often swing quite wildly from the house vote in the previous year.
Logged
Since I'm the mad scientist proclaimed by myself
omegascarlet
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,101


« Reply #1 on: July 31, 2017, 08:12:59 PM »

Taking into account house 2016 vote is problematic, as factors such as variations in the quality of the opposing candidate can wildly swing the seat(EG AZ-02 swinging 10 points R in 2016 because Heinz was a terrible candidate with effectively no campaign.) Seats won in waves often swing quite wildly from the house vote in the previous year.
Of course it is problematic due to the factors you mention. But I can't see a better solution than that, since Pennsylvania, Minnesota, and New York all have at least one Trump district D-held seat and one HRC district R-held seat. I, for one, don't think Dave Reichert's seat in WA-08 will be more likely to go Democrat in 2018 than AZ-01.

Also, added two-party House Dem vote performance over two-party HRC vote in 2016, which I missed last time.

You have to accept that a map based on data isn't going to be perfect, and a map that underestimates a few strong incumbents is better then a map that overestimates a lot of mediocre incumbents who had bad challengers.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.016 seconds with 10 queries.