DHS rejects "religiously-charged terminology" (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 18, 2024, 12:27:33 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  DHS rejects "religiously-charged terminology" (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: DHS rejects "religiously-charged terminology"  (Read 1660 times)
world.execute(me)
omegascarlet
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,118


« on: June 17, 2016, 02:46:18 PM »

I don't think anyone actually argues that "our insensitivity" is why groups like ISIS exist and engage in terrorism. Rather, what is being argued here is that, in our zeal to fight the terrorists who operate under the banner of "radical Islam", failing to treat a religion of over 1 billion followers with nuance will only reinforce the appeal of groups like ISIS to those young Muslims who might be considering joining such a group but still have reservations about it.  In other words, if we don't act with caution and sensitivity, we would just be proving the extremists correct, that we really are at a war with all of Islam.

Also, just for the record, both "sharia" and "jihad" have much broader (and more legitimate) uses within Islam than the way in which the violent fanatics use them - which is the usage that Americans are familiar with.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 12 queries.