What would an election between RINO Tom and White Trash look like? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 12:03:08 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Forum Community
  Forum Community (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, YE, KoopaDaQuick 🇵🇸)
  What would an election between RINO Tom and White Trash look like? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: What would an election between RINO Tom and White Trash look like?  (Read 1254 times)
White Trash
Southern Gothic
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,910


« on: May 31, 2017, 11:43:19 AM »
« edited: May 31, 2017, 01:09:59 PM by White Trash »

So a pro-choice Charlie Baker-type "fiscal conservative" vs. a pro-life (I believe?) "populist" Democrat? (Of course this assumes that they actually somehow win their party's nomination despite holding these views and don't change them)

Sorry Tom, but I think it would look like this:



Iowa goes R because of the home state bonus. I think this would be a solid SouthernGothic victory, but not because RINO Tom is an awful candidate or campaigner. I just believe Tom would have a much harder time rallying the base than Southern Gothic, and he would be faced with an uphill battle in the Electoral College as well.

The margins in places like Fairfax County and WV-03 would be astonishing in this election.
This seems fairly realistic, I doubt I'd win NV, NM, and AZ since I would have very limited appeal to latinos outside of being Catholic. And I doubt MT and the Dakotas would be big fans of me given my anti-fracking stance.

A swing map for this election would be hysterical.
Logged
White Trash
Southern Gothic
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,910


« Reply #1 on: May 31, 2017, 06:40:43 PM »

So a pro-choice Charlie Baker-type "fiscal conservative" vs. a pro-life (I believe?) "populist" Democrat? (Of course this assumes that they actually somehow win their party's nomination despite holding these views and don't change them)

Sorry Tom, but I think it would look like this:



Iowa goes R because of the home state bonus. I think this would be a solid SouthernGothic victory, but not because RINO Tom is an awful candidate or campaigner. I just believe Tom would have a much harder time rallying the base than Southern Gothic, and he would be faced with an uphill battle in the Electoral College as well.

The margins in places like Fairfax County and WV-03 would be astonishing in this election.
This seems fairly realistic, I doubt I'd win NV, NM, and AZ since I would have very limited appeal to latinos outside of being Catholic. And I doubt MT and the Dakotas would be big fans of me given my anti-fracking stance.

A swing map for this election would be hysterical.

You think you would hold all of MN, WA, OR, ME, CT, NJ, NY, and VT?
I think that any urbanites votes I lost in MN, WA, and OR would be made up be driving up the margins in rural areas. I think I'd actually do better in Maine's 2nd CD than it's 1st which is strange for a Democrat.

As far as NJ and CT go, I'd be pretty reliant on LLRs goons.
Logged
White Trash
Southern Gothic
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,910


« Reply #2 on: June 02, 2017, 08:38:25 AM »
« Edited: June 02, 2017, 09:09:55 AM by White Trash »

I think the funniest thing about this election is how much the alma maters clash and in reality seem to completely contradict the personas they put on, but I mean, I guess adulterous billionaire Donald Trump from Wharton School of Finance was a populist Christian so nothing matters except persona anymore.
What do you mean?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 11 queries.