Why was the Democratic establishment so united behind Clinton in the beginning? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 31, 2024, 03:28:23 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Why was the Democratic establishment so united behind Clinton in the beginning? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why was the Democratic establishment so united behind Clinton in the beginning?  (Read 3295 times)
White Trash
Southern Gothic
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,910


« on: May 30, 2017, 01:21:52 PM »

Because it was widely believed that Clinton was a very good candidate and seemed to possess high approval numbers throughout 2013/2014. Also when she got behind the Obama campaign in 2008, it was widely believed by most that in return for an Undivided party, Hillary was to be a shoe in for the 2016 democrat presidential nominee.

People we're literally begging Hillary to run in 13/14. The media was all upset that Hillary was dragging out her announcement and pretending to not want to run in late 14/early 15. Hillary had sky high approval ratings after her non political 4 years as Secretary of State. There were actual polls posted on the Atlas showing Hillary winning or scarily competitive in AR,LA,WV,KY,MS, and MO.
You sure this wasn't from 2008?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 13 queries.