Most underrated evil person in history? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 29, 2024, 02:39:18 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  History (Moderator: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee)
  Most underrated evil person in history? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Most underrated evil person in history?  (Read 7331 times)
RightBehind
AlwaysBernie
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,209


« on: May 19, 2016, 10:23:31 PM »
« edited: May 20, 2016, 10:47:40 AM by RightBehind »

Who do you think is the most evil person in history that often isn't classified in such a category?

I'd have to go with D.F. Malan. He had a very oppressive regime, and I would argue he was the worst of all the Apartheid leaders, which is really saying something.
Logged
RightBehind
AlwaysBernie
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,209


« Reply #1 on: May 19, 2016, 10:37:37 PM »

Ceaucescu has to be up there too.
Logged
RightBehind
AlwaysBernie
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,209


« Reply #2 on: May 20, 2016, 10:50:07 AM »


I was reading his Wiki article not too long ago, and this in particular stuck with me:

Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Just let that sink in for a moment.

That was one of many terrible things he did.
Logged
RightBehind
AlwaysBernie
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,209


« Reply #3 on: May 20, 2016, 02:19:07 PM »

Mao, Pol Pot and Genghis Khan I wouldn't call underrated. When one Googles or YouTubes the most evil people in history, those names usually pop ups with Hitler and Stalin.

Some of the people mentioned here I have never heard of. I have to admit, the Richard Quest one was humorous, but it goes to show how history tends to forget some people's deeds.
Logged
RightBehind
AlwaysBernie
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,209


« Reply #4 on: May 25, 2016, 02:53:44 PM »

Did history start in 1900? How about some variety here?

Tbf in Classical and medieval times most records are basically propoganda, and the standard was pretty low.

Maybe Pope Urban the Crusader?



Lots of Popes were pretty bad. Alexander VI and Leo X come to mind.
Logged
RightBehind
AlwaysBernie
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,209


« Reply #5 on: May 26, 2016, 04:19:07 PM »

Another candidate for evil (and stupid) is Fernando lopez of Peru, who ended up sacrificing the majority of the population for his idiotic wars.

Surely you mean Francisco Solano López of Paraguay?

Did history start in 1900? How about some variety here?

Tbf in Classical and medieval times most records are basically propoganda, and the standard was pretty low.

Maybe Pope Urban the Crusader?



Lots of Popes were pretty bad. Alexander VI and Leo X come to mind.

Leo X was an incompetent buffoon, not evil. Describing Urban II as 'evil' also strikes me as too simplistic a way of understanding the genesis of the Crusades, but admittedly Urban's foresight in his policy towards Campania and Sicily means that he probably does not have the excuse of not understanding the consequences of his actions. Alexander VI was absolutely vile, but not really 'underrated' for being so, since he's where most people's minds go when they think of disgusting Renaissance popes.

For some reason I thought Leo X engaged in torture.

Urban VI was nasty. So was Innocent IV.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 11 queries.