Describe a stereotypical Democratic voter for these categories (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 16, 2024, 09:48:23 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Describe a stereotypical Democratic voter for these categories (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Describe a stereotypical Democratic voter for these categories  (Read 1747 times)
James Bond 007
Rookie
**
Posts: 156
United States


« on: March 07, 2016, 12:45:49 AM »

Wants free stuff.
Wants free stuff.
Wants free stuff.
Wants free stuff.
Logged
James Bond 007
Rookie
**
Posts: 156
United States


« Reply #1 on: March 07, 2016, 12:57:57 AM »

Wants free stuff.
Wants free stuff.
Wants free stuff.
Wants free stuff.

People on the right think that liberals like myself always want free stuff. No. I want an end to the fascist corporatocracy that America has become. I'm sick of the corruption, bribery and lack of honesty/transparency in Washington. I'd like to see money go to help out people rather than to just help out corporate welfare some more, or to ram up defense spending even more to give in to our fears and feed the military industrial complex. If another war happens like an Afghanistan or Iraq, maybe it can be necessary as a last resort to go there and not to send brave men and women off to die to make defense contractors richer.

Sanders impositions are fascist.  What corruption have you experienced.  It's out there but mainly in Washington D.C.  Bribery such as, "vote for me and you'll get this or that" has no place in our prosperous nation.  Corporate welfare is a problem but then why the bailouts supported by Obama?  Why bail out Ford and GM?  I can argue on the plus side that jobs were saved, but who really benefited the most?  Defense spending is what gives you the right to criticize it.  You're saying 9/11 leading to Afghanistan was for defense contractors?  Maybe you just heard the elders in your party using the terminology?  Not posting anything on such matters would help your party's image more than posting about material you only have partisan language to use about.  You brought up some vague points that I could probably make better than you in defense of your party too.  
Logged
James Bond 007
Rookie
**
Posts: 156
United States


« Reply #2 on: March 07, 2016, 12:58:59 AM »

Wants free stuff.
Wants free stuff.
Wants free stuff.
Wants free stuff.

Yesss, please.


People on the right think that liberals like myself always want free stuff. No. I want an end to the fascist corporatocracy that America has become. I'm sick of the corruption, bribery and lack of honesty/transparency in Washington. I'd like to see money go to help out people rather than to just help out corporate welfare some more, or to ram up defense spending even more to give in to our fears and feed the military industrial complex. If another war happens like an Afghanistan or Iraq, maybe it can be necessary as a last resort to go there and not to send brave men and women off to die to make defense contractors richer.

Also, this.

It's ok you can get to the top on your own without Democrats' promises.  Just believe in yourself!
Logged
James Bond 007
Rookie
**
Posts: 156
United States


« Reply #3 on: March 07, 2016, 01:14:54 AM »

Wants free stuff.
Wants free stuff.
Wants free stuff.
Wants free stuff.

People on the right think that liberals like myself always want free stuff. No. I want an end to the fascist corporatocracy that America has become. I'm sick of the corruption, bribery and lack of honesty/transparency in Washington. I'd like to see money go to help out people rather than to just help out corporate welfare some more, or to ram up defense spending even more to give in to our fears and feed the military industrial complex. If another war happens like an Afghanistan or Iraq, maybe it can be necessary as a last resort to go there and not to send brave men and women off to die to make defense contractors richer.

Sanders impositions are fascist.  What corruption have you experienced.  It's out there but mainly in Washington D.C.  Bribery such as, "vote for me and you'll get this or that" has no place in our prosperous nation.  Corporate welfare is a problem but then why the bailouts supported by Obama?  Why bail out Ford and GM?  I can argue on the plus side that jobs were saved, but who really benefited the most?  Defense spending is what gives you the right to criticize it.  You're saying 9/11 leading to Afghanistan was for defense contractors?  Maybe you just heard the elders in your party using the terminology?  Not posting anything on such matters would help your party's image more than posting about material you only have partisan language to use about.  You brought up some vague points that I could probably make better than you in defense of your party too.  

Mussolini said fascism may as well be called corporatism because it's a merger between corporation and state. How does that, in any way, describe what Sanders wants?

Corruption is where politicians are bought and paid for by lobbyists and special interest groups. They're owned by big money, and that's wrong.

In regards to defense spending, there's some kind of mass paranoia around it. Should we be number one and have the strongest military? Absolutely, but we can afford cuts. Don't tell me it's going to be armageddon if we're still outspending the next eight countries combined even if we spend less than we did before.

Notice how I also said Iraq in addition to Afghanistan. I think going to Afghanistan was justifiable. Iraq wasn't, but my position on condemning war profiteers stands.


Well if Mussolini said something then it has to be true and we should all switch parties right? I didn't know Democrats weren't subject to lobbying.  Ever hear of Dick Gephardt?  He's quite the lobbyist himself now.  You probably don't care though as I described the typical voter for all four categories.  It doesn't sound like you're interested in much other than making sure the private sector fails.  Where would our economic growth come from?  We can afford to close military bases we no longer use, but what we spend money on for defense is more complex than just going to war so now you're opening up a big debate of nitty gritty spending that will likely only fall back on not everyone living the luxury life of a billionaire. When it comes to stopping Islamic extremism, there's nothing too extreme unless of course we're ok with them ruling the world.  War profiteering is how you changed your wording of defense contracts and it's clear it's only been passed onto you from watching your party elders in the media. If you want I can help make better arguments in favor of things like constitutional amendments raising the minimum wage to keep up with inflation and how healthcare works better by expanding medicaid rather than 2,700 pages of bureaucratic garbage.  Let me know.  In fact I proposed these things as part of my economic policy on the Economics forum I believe it was.
Logged
James Bond 007
Rookie
**
Posts: 156
United States


« Reply #4 on: March 07, 2016, 01:56:59 AM »

Wants free stuff.
Wants free stuff.
Wants free stuff.
Wants free stuff.

People on the right think that liberals like myself always want free stuff. No. I want an end to the fascist corporatocracy that America has become. I'm sick of the corruption, bribery and lack of honesty/transparency in Washington. I'd like to see money go to help out people rather than to just help out corporate welfare some more, or to ram up defense spending even more to give in to our fears and feed the military industrial complex. If another war happens like an Afghanistan or Iraq, maybe it can be necessary as a last resort to go there and not to send brave men and women off to die to make defense contractors richer.

Sanders impositions are fascist.  What corruption have you experienced.  It's out there but mainly in Washington D.C.  Bribery such as, "vote for me and you'll get this or that" has no place in our prosperous nation.  Corporate welfare is a problem but then why the bailouts supported by Obama?  Why bail out Ford and GM?  I can argue on the plus side that jobs were saved, but who really benefited the most?  Defense spending is what gives you the right to criticize it.  You're saying 9/11 leading to Afghanistan was for defense contractors?  Maybe you just heard the elders in your party using the terminology?  Not posting anything on such matters would help your party's image more than posting about material you only have partisan language to use about.  You brought up some vague points that I could probably make better than you in defense of your party too.  

Mussolini said fascism may as well be called corporatism because it's a merger between corporation and state. How does that, in any way, describe what Sanders wants?

Corruption is where politicians are bought and paid for by lobbyists and special interest groups. They're owned by big money, and that's wrong.

In regards to defense spending, there's some kind of mass paranoia around it. Should we be number one and have the strongest military? Absolutely, but we can afford cuts. Don't tell me it's going to be armageddon if we're still outspending the next eight countries combined even if we spend less than we did before.

Notice how I also said Iraq in addition to Afghanistan. I think going to Afghanistan was justifiable. Iraq wasn't, but my position on condemning war profiteers stands.


Well if Mussolini said something then it has to be true and we should all switch parties right? I didn't know Democrats weren't subject to lobbying.  Ever hear of Dick Gephardt?  He's quite the lobbyist himself now.  You probably don't care though as I described the typical voter for all four categories.  It doesn't sound like you're interested in much other than making sure the private sector fails.  Where would our economic growth come from?  We can afford to close military bases we no longer use, but what we spend money on for defense is more complex than just going to war so now you're opening up a big debate of nitty gritty spending that will likely only fall back on not everyone living the luxury life of a billionaire. When it comes to stopping Islamic extremism, there's nothing too extreme unless of course we're ok with them ruling the world.  War profiteering is how you changed your wording of defense contracts and it's clear it's only been passed onto you from watching your party elders in the media. If you want I can help make better arguments in favor of things like constitutional amendments raising the minimum wage to keep up with inflation and how healthcare works better by expanding medicaid rather than 2,700 pages of bureaucratic garbage.  Let me know.  In fact I proposed these things as part of my economic policy on the Economics forum I believe it was.

Don't put words in my post. I never said Democrats weren't subjected to lobbying. I don't approve. In fact, Schultz and the DNC have gotten on my last nerve trying to rig this for Hillary because Bernie isn't part of their clique.

Mussolini was a dictator of a fascist country. I'd think he had a better grasp on fascism than some person on a message board does.

Stop acting like the sky is falling if we cut defense in the slightest. I've read before that military officials themselves think government spends unnecessary things on defense. You might be vulnerable to fear mongering, but I'm not. If there's wasteful spending, let's cut it and put it towards things to help the citizens.

Do you seriously think there's no war profiteering? Do you think defense contractors don't make money and the politicians don't profit? War is a big business. When need be, war might sometimes be necessary, but starting wars for profits and natural resources isn't.

People wonder why the world hates us, I know why. Not that Iran is a perfect country or anything and I'm no fan of Sharia, but our tension can be traced back to deposing Mossadegh and putting in the Shah to benefit our interests. Us supporting freedom and democracy is all a facade if we benefit by supporting dictatorships and thus I question us when it comes to human rights. If Putin overthrew Obama and put in his own guy so Russia could benefit, how would you like it? We are a joke if we claim to be all about freedom but have an alliance going with Saudi Arabia.


There's a big smokescreen, a mirage. I love America. I don't hate it, but I can see why others do.

The Shah was a much better alternative.  My social studies teacher always told us the same thing along with Bush cheating in Florida and tax cuts for the rich.  As for Shariah law, it's not feminist so I'm against it.  I'd think you and your party would be doing all you could to stop it.
Logged
James Bond 007
Rookie
**
Posts: 156
United States


« Reply #5 on: March 07, 2016, 11:43:54 PM »

Wants free stuff.
Wants free stuff.
Wants free stuff.
Wants free stuff.

People on the right think that liberals like myself always want free stuff. No. I want an end to the fascist corporatocracy that America has become. I'm sick of the corruption, bribery and lack of honesty/transparency in Washington. I'd like to see money go to help out people rather than to just help out corporate welfare some more, or to ram up defense spending even more to give in to our fears and feed the military industrial complex. If another war happens like an Afghanistan or Iraq, maybe it can be necessary as a last resort to go there and not to send brave men and women off to die to make defense contractors richer.

Sanders impositions are fascist.  What corruption have you experienced.  It's out there but mainly in Washington D.C.  Bribery such as, "vote for me and you'll get this or that" has no place in our prosperous nation.  Corporate welfare is a problem but then why the bailouts supported by Obama?  Why bail out Ford and GM?  I can argue on the plus side that jobs were saved, but who really benefited the most?  Defense spending is what gives you the right to criticize it.  You're saying 9/11 leading to Afghanistan was for defense contractors?  Maybe you just heard the elders in your party using the terminology?  Not posting anything on such matters would help your party's image more than posting about material you only have partisan language to use about.  You brought up some vague points that I could probably make better than you in defense of your party too.  

As a guy who recklessly blows up millions of dollars of taxpayer-bought gadgets on a regular basis, you should really shut your mouth about "government largesse"

me or him?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.04 seconds with 13 queries.