SB 2018-177: Transparency is a Right Act (Passed) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 07:31:35 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  SB 2018-177: Transparency is a Right Act (Passed) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SB 2018-177: Transparency is a Right Act (Passed)  (Read 1947 times)
fhtagn
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,562
Vatican City State


« on: April 06, 2018, 12:46:18 PM »

Actually, I think we're missing something. What exactly is the punishment? We say officeholders "must" comply, but I'm not sure if the consequences are clear here given the current case before the Supreme Court.

Perhaps we might add a clause regarding officeholders who break this particular bill should be considered as having grounds to be impeached or charged with a crime?

Perhaps punishment can be that if they break the bill they should immediately be put to a special election?  That way the people can be the jury and decide the lawmaker's fate?

I feel like requiring a special election might require a constitutional amendment. Lets just make it a class 1 misdemeanor and proceed to a final vote to clear the floor.

But how exactly would thay apply in game in the event someone is found guilty of it?

I personally think dismissal from the position would be a fair punishment for violating it. They'd be more than welcome to run again another time, they would just lose their seniority and their position (if they were Speaker/PPT/Deputies of each).
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 12 queries.