Democratic Wild Western Tuesday results thread (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 01:06:34 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Democratic Wild Western Tuesday results thread (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Democratic Wild Western Tuesday results thread  (Read 28769 times)
dax00
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,422


« on: March 23, 2016, 03:34:58 AM »

Good god, Utah county is at 85% Sanders. At this rate I gotta wonder if these folks just refused to vote for a woman lol

Sanders is closing in on 80%.
Hillary is just a horrible candidate. If Sanders can keep over 78.57%, the delegate split should be in his favor, 27-6
Logged
dax00
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,422


« Reply #1 on: March 23, 2016, 04:09:35 AM »

I predict (in Utah) he'll continue to slowly decline, but will remain over 78.57%.
Logged
dax00
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,422


« Reply #2 on: March 23, 2016, 08:39:10 AM »

Sanders looks to have a solid next 3 weeks ...

Which will all be negated by NY on the 19th...
I wouldn't be so quick to call NY for Hillary
Logged
dax00
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,422


« Reply #3 on: March 23, 2016, 10:02:07 AM »

I am hoping Bernie wins files a suit due to Arizona fraud - Under-staffing & so few polling areas, people standing in a line all night - A lot of people give provisional ballot because they ran out of ballots. They don't count provisional ballots.

I can understand that it being closed, many independents were turned away but how come many life long Democrats were turned away because they were surprisingly not registered.

I don't think it is a deliberate effort, but a massacre due to horrible incompetency.
Now then, the issuance of provisional ballots may have limited the counted votes, but one would imagine that there wouldn't be such a significant discrepancy between the make-up of those early enough to receive actual ballots and those who had to do with the provisionals for there to be considerable impact on the delegate count. Their incompetence, intentional or not, may have negatively affected either candidate. And how Hillary seems to have foolishly assumed the nomination, one would also imagine she would not have been so rash as to have orchestrated such a risky maneuver.
Logged
dax00
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,422


« Reply #4 on: March 23, 2016, 10:29:01 AM »

I am no saying it has decided a victory or not - But it could have had a big difference in % or somewhat which changes the delegate math.

Clinton won because she swept the early voting - If you consider election day results Sanders won in  most counties - Otherwise he would be worse.

I have heard complains from plenty of Bernie supporters - I am not saying Clinton people were not likely to be affected, they were & Bernie's people got more affected.

Either way it is unfair on both candidates, it's BS & he needs to push it to ensure this nonsense is not getting repeated
I see. Considerably more upset now :/
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 11 queries.