Opinion in TCash101 v. Southeast

[Ebowed]

I support the comments of others that the Court was usuing judicial activism, not sound constitutional judgement, to rule on this case.

Do you even know what judicial activism is?

[Ebowed]

Yes it is when you put personal feelings ahead of the law in order to amend, uphold, or create laws.

And you're going to say this is what happened every time the Court hands down a decision you disagree with, correct?

[Ebowed]

For a company to deny any individual employment on the basis of their union membership, or not, is clearly an affront that on that individual's rights to be a member of, or not be a member, of a labor union

One could also say that for the government to deny an employers' right to discriminate against persons on the basis of membership in a union is clearly an affront on his right to run his business as he sees fit.