Which is worse? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 12:17:57 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Which is worse? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Which scandalous event was actually worse?
#1
Those working for the Nixon campaign breaking into a Democratic campaign HQ in a third rate burglary.
 
#2
LBJ ordering B. Goldwaters campaign HQs bugged (unsuccessful) and bugging his campaign airplane (successful).
 
#3
Neither are bad.
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 23

Author Topic: Which is worse?  (Read 1951 times)
Ebowed
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,596


Political Matrix
E: 4.13, S: 2.09

WWW
« on: June 08, 2005, 12:55:17 AM »

Both were bad-- but bugging a campaign airplane got my vote.  Johnson was a very mean man, and somewhat of a hack, and the way he wrongly framed Goldwater as someone who wants to unleash nuclear weapons on the people was sickening.  But I have a very hard time believing that Hubert Humphrey authorized any wrongdoings against Nixon in '68, as Nixon had occasionally implied.

By the way, there was more to Watergate than the third rate burglary.  I've always been most troubled by fake pamphlets and tricks that occured that actually occured at campaigns, not ones in party headquarters.  For example, I seem to remember reading about pamphlets supposedly from the McGovern camp accusing Humphrey and Muskie of illicit sexual conduct, when they were actually done by Nixon's team!  Disgusting!
Logged
Ebowed
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,596


Political Matrix
E: 4.13, S: 2.09

WWW
« Reply #1 on: June 08, 2005, 12:57:39 AM »

I mentioned those when I talked about Goldwater unleashing nuclear weapons.  Don't compare Nixon to LBJ to make him look better; the fact is, Nixon did some dirty stuff, and it was very wrong.
Logged
Ebowed
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,596


Political Matrix
E: 4.13, S: 2.09

WWW
« Reply #2 on: June 08, 2005, 01:04:42 AM »

I remember that when Johnson made an announcement on Vietnam on October 31st, Humphrey went up in the polls.  How could Nixon have sabotaged them?
Logged
Ebowed
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,596


Political Matrix
E: 4.13, S: 2.09

WWW
« Reply #3 on: June 08, 2005, 01:14:16 AM »

I remember that when Johnson made an announcement on Vietnam on October 31st, Humphrey went up in the polls.  How could Nixon have sabotaged them?

http://www.thenation.com/docprint.mhtml?i=20001106&s=wiener
Whoa, pretty sick stuff if it's true.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 14 queries.