What's your Abortion Policy? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 09, 2024, 03:59:21 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  What's your Abortion Policy? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Abortion Policy?
#1
Pro-Choice
 
#2
Pro-Choice, with exceptions
 
#3
Somewhere in between
 
#4
Pro-Life, with exceptions
 
#5
Pro-Life
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 48

Author Topic: What's your Abortion Policy?  (Read 14682 times)
Ebowed
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,596


Political Matrix
E: 4.13, S: 2.09

WWW
« on: January 10, 2014, 09:29:30 AM »

Abortion is a medical procedure that should be included in universal healthcare coverage regardless of income level.

I don't support restrictions on abortion if that's what the poll is asking.
Logged
Ebowed
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,596


Political Matrix
E: 4.13, S: 2.09

WWW
« Reply #1 on: January 10, 2014, 09:49:20 AM »

Partial-birth abortion is a bit sick, but other than that... rock and roll, ladies. 

Dilation & extraction (aka partial birth abortion) can actually be a safer method of performing a late termination than dilation & evacuation as the latter risks leaving parts of the fetus in the uterus, increasing the risk of infection.  It is grisly, but they were rare enough prior to the uproar resulting in the 'PBA' ban that it should be recognized as a smokescreen to advance an agenda that threatens reproductive autonomy.
Logged
Ebowed
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,596


Political Matrix
E: 4.13, S: 2.09

WWW
« Reply #2 on: January 10, 2014, 10:20:30 AM »

Partial-birth abortion is a bit sick, but other than that... rock and roll, ladies. 

Dilation & extraction (aka partial birth abortion) can actually be a safer method of performing a late termination than dilation & evacuation as the latter risks leaving parts of the fetus in the uterus, increasing the risk of infection.  It is grisly, but they were rare enough prior to the uproar resulting in the 'PBA' ban that it should be recognized as a smokescreen to advance an agenda that threatens reproductive autonomy.

Of course, but that doesn't take away from it being grisly and that the infant should be viable at that point.  Child rape is relatively rare... shall we leave that unpunished and permissible? 

Well, if your concern is with the age of the fetus, your problem is not so much with 'partial birth abortion' as a procedure and more to do with its viability regardless of how the termination is conducted.  What I'm trying to say is that a ban on 'partial birth' doesn't target these late term abortions, but rather a specific way of performing them.  The comparison to child rape is not helpful.

If you lack a desire to prohibit late-term terminations but still support a ban on the D&X procedure, I recommend researching the opposition to this ban, as it was actually extraordinarily rare and generally used only for reasons to protect the health of the mother.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.032 seconds with 14 queries.