NYT acquires 1995 Trump tax return; he deducted $916 million in business losses (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 16, 2024, 07:06:52 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  NYT acquires 1995 Trump tax return; he deducted $916 million in business losses (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: NYT acquires 1995 Trump tax return; he deducted $916 million in business losses  (Read 14692 times)
PeteB
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,993
Canada


« on: October 03, 2016, 09:39:37 AM »

This thread is too convoluted for me Smiley.  Here are my simple three takeaways:

1. The tax carry-forward losses that Trump took are legal.  They do not necessarily mean that he is a bad (or good) businessman nor do they mean that he did anything wrong.  Yes, the values involved are huge, but so is the book real estate value that they are likely based on.

2. Unfortunately, for Trump, in addition to the legal argument, there is a moral side to all this.  First of all, the return does illustrate his hypocrisy; he has made a point of criticizing others for similar things (why would anyone who is legitimately on welfare, or has legitimately taken advantage of another government program be any more guilty than Trump?).  On top of it, this is a story that will just play very poorly with independent voters and even his supporters, however he spins it.

3. Last but not least, this serves as an indicator and a red flag.  The fact that he did these financial maneuvers in 1995 begs the question what else has he done in subsequent years.  Just as Clinton is legitimately questioned about the Clinton Foundation ("pay for play"), Trump should clearly address whether his financials are putting him in a potentially compromising situation.  If he is not releasing his tax returns and financial info, then people should not trust him - plain and simple.
Logged
PeteB
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,993
Canada


« Reply #1 on: October 03, 2016, 07:37:46 PM »


Lends a lot of smoke to the theory that Marla or Tiffany Trump sent them to both papers

It is a theory that is going around. Well Marla would certainly have a copy of what was sent, and of course she lives in NYC right now and in 1999 when she threatened to spill the beans on Trump if he ran for prez he withheld her alimony. 
https://www.buzzfeed.com/andrewkaczynski/during-1999-run-trump-refused-to-pay-ex-wifes-alimony-when-s?utm_term=.qrnG5j2NW#.iwgmXg4dV 

And if you were someone currently inside Trump's organization and wanted to leak tax docs, wouldn't you release something more recent?

It may also explain why NYT feel free to release the actual documents, because they were given to them by one of the signatories of said docs.

Interesting theory but let me propose an alternative. 1995 was probably chosen for its dramatic content.   I doubt that Trump had that high carry forward losses since then. As for Marla Maples (Trump), there really is no reason for her to do this. If she had any beef with Trump, she could milk it more if she waited for him to become President, so why torpedo him now? I suspect this is a source who does not like Trump and had access to the 1995 tax returns (a bank official, casino licensing official, lawyer who represented him or his then wife or even the accountant who compiled this.

Of course, we'll never know until we get the full tax returns. Smiley
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 13 queries.