Will Gianforte's win encourage future acts of violence by Republican candidates?

[Dr. Arch]

It's clear that a good portion of our country's national culture is ill. I'm not even sure how to address such a thing.

[Dr. Arch]

The right wing brags about violence and whines about it at the same time.

It's most certainly the party of Trump now.

[Dr. Arch]

Again, yell for me when my side throws a molotov cocktail into one of your offices. Or when non Trump supporters get egged, punched, and bloodied on their way into a rally for their own candidate.

Instead playing victim and complaining...you guys need self-defense lessons.

     Could stand to crib a page or two from the demonstrators who successfully defended themselves at the Battle of Berkeley.

When the people fighting you are ''Carl the cuck'' and ''moldylocks''...it dosent take much to defend yourself

     On the other hand, Antifa professors armed with bike locks are a little more dangerous.

And yet Democrats will never elect any of them to Precinct chairperson let alone to Congress.

Their argument is false equivalence at its finest. They're just trying to rationalize the depths to which they've had to go to just defend a political party member.

[Dr. Arch]

I love how the left expects us not defend our own political views. I love how we're always wrong and must always agree and if not, we're "deflecting" or "rationalizing" or "condoning" violence, all the while as they themselves continue to perpetrate such acts. And when you bring it up, the same stuff happens again.

We aren't dealing with rational people here.

If your political views involve defending/electing a criminal who assaulted a journalist, they are indefensible.