SCOTUS-Watch: It's Gorsuch! (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 11:36:17 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  SCOTUS-Watch: It's Gorsuch! (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SCOTUS-Watch: It's Gorsuch!  (Read 27716 times)
Dr. Arch
Arch
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,453
Puerto Rico


« on: January 30, 2017, 03:22:10 PM »
I'd be satisfied with a Hardiman pick.
Logged
Dr. Arch
Arch
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,453
Puerto Rico


« Reply #1 on: January 31, 2017, 12:29:29 AM »
Logged
Dr. Arch
Arch
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,453
Puerto Rico


« Reply #2 on: January 31, 2017, 01:42:12 PM »

Hopefully not
Logged
Dr. Arch
Arch
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,453
Puerto Rico


« Reply #3 on: January 31, 2017, 01:47:52 PM »

Can't see it.
Logged
Dr. Arch
Arch
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,453
Puerto Rico


« Reply #4 on: January 31, 2017, 01:52:17 PM »
Logged
Dr. Arch
Arch
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,453
Puerto Rico


« Reply #5 on: January 31, 2017, 08:05:07 PM »
Ugh....
Logged
Dr. Arch
Arch
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,453
Puerto Rico


« Reply #6 on: February 01, 2017, 02:20:36 PM »
This is an unprecedented steal for a seat in the Supreme Court. I have no reason to respect such actions. They could have given Garland a hearing AT LEAST, but no. They knew he was qualified so they just blocked him until their party could get their nominee in.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 10 queries.