SC-PPP: Trump +2

[Dr. Arch]

[Dr. Arch]

I'm sure Trump supporters are just as skeptical of polls showing a tight race in Safe D states like OR, CT, ME, and NV.

I did not doubt the legitimacy of this particular poll, I was speaking in general terms.

I believe that Clinton could lose OR, CT, ME and NV while winning GA and SC.

In a major realignment which may or may not happen, the map above is possible.

LOL

[Dr. Arch]

I'm sure Trump supporters are just as skeptical of polls showing a tight race in Safe D states like OR, CT, ME, and NV.

I did not doubt the legitimacy of this particular poll, I was speaking in general terms.

I believe that Clinton could lose OR, CT, ME and NV while winning GA and SC.

[img]

In a major realignment which may or may not happen, the map above is possible.

LOL

I really have no idea why you continue to use 2000 as a model for all elections. The traditional (since 2000 at least) concept of blue states and red states is being shook to the core.

The race is close in South Carolina, just like it is close in Michigan as the polls seem to suggest. (Whether they may be right or wrong).

Close in Michigan? WHAT?

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/mi/michigan_trump_vs_clinton-5533.html

Wisconsin?

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/wi/wisconsin_trump_vs_clinton-5659.html

New Hampshire? (This average doesn't even have today's double-digit result in it yet)

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/nh/new_hampshire_trump_vs_clinton-5596.html

[Dr. Arch]

So yes, while the race is close in the south, it is also close in states like Michigan, Maine, Oregon and Connecticut.

stop posting you are humiliating yourself.

I literally debunked this earlier with links to RCP averages, and he completely ignored it. The shortsightedness is real.