Primary bellwether states (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 16, 2024, 09:32:09 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Primary bellwether states (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Primary bellwether states  (Read 2532 times)
sportydude
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 589


« on: March 20, 2016, 01:07:24 PM »

Michigan is the anti-bellwether state no. 1.
Seen from this angle, it isn't even surprising that Bernie won Michigan. That voting pattern was actually very consistent in fact.
Logged
sportydude
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 589


« Reply #1 on: March 21, 2016, 02:35:32 AM »

Michigan is the anti-bellwether state no. 1.
Seen from this angle, it isn't even surprising that Bernie won Michigan. That voting pattern was actually very consistent in fact.

It does have a contrarian history for both parties. 2008 perhaps deserves an asterisk since Obama wasn't on the ballot, but it also voted for Jackson in 1988.

They voted for Wallace in 1972, for Jackson in 1988 and now for Sanders. Okay ...
Either the Michigan Democrats despise their national party (like the Oklahomans do) or they just love trolling around. (Aren't Michiganians even called trolls?)
Logged
sportydude
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 589


« Reply #2 on: March 21, 2016, 01:52:49 PM »

So, if I'm not mistaken, the only Democratic primary bellwethers (going back to '88) are Wisconsin, North Dakota, Montana, Oregon and Hawaii, each of which is likely to vote for Bernie. lol.

If they really do, the remaining bellwether states would be Illinois, Missouri, Virginia, Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi and Louisiana.
Logged
sportydude
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 589


« Reply #3 on: March 27, 2016, 03:24:22 PM »

Goodbye, Hawaii, goodbye! 👋 Cry
Logged
sportydude
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 589


« Reply #4 on: April 06, 2016, 06:30:58 AM »

And we have another traitor: Wisconsin...  😫
Logged
sportydude
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 589


« Reply #5 on: May 21, 2016, 06:25:48 PM »
« Edited: May 22, 2016, 08:45:26 PM by sportydude »

Bernie seems to have disturbed the whole bellwether system.
There was a sliiiight chance of Hillary winning Oregon, but since she blew it, there aren't any 1988 bellwether states left anymore. (Montana and North Dakota are unconquerable Bernie territory, of course.)
The most "senior" primary bellwether states began their streak back in 1992:

Logged
sportydude
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 589


« Reply #6 on: May 21, 2016, 08:49:04 PM »

On the Republican side, Kasich and Rafael switched off Ohio and Wisconsin:

Logged
sportydude
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 589


« Reply #7 on: May 21, 2016, 09:03:00 PM »

And the super bellwether state is: ILLINOIS
It's the only state that belongs to the most "senior" primary bellwether states on both sides.
Logged
sportydude
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 589


« Reply #8 on: May 22, 2016, 09:40:50 PM »

Is Oklahoma the most anti-bellwether state for both parties?

Going back to 1992, there are five states sharing the prize as the super anti-bellwether state for either party's primaries: Alaska, Colorado, Michigan, New Hampshire, Oklahoma. Each of them were five times off the mark.

Several states were four times off the mark:
Arizona, Iowa, Kansas, Massachusetts, Maine, Minnesota, North Dakota, Rhode Island, Utah, Vermont

Thrice:
Idaho, Louisiana, Nevada, South Dakota, Tennessee, Wyoming
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 12 queries.