Democratic MI/MS election results thread (first results @8pm ET) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 02:37:33 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Democratic MI/MS election results thread (first results @8pm ET) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Democratic MI/MS election results thread (first results @8pm ET)  (Read 30114 times)
indysaff
reapersaff
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 342
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.03, S: -5.91
« on: March 08, 2016, 07:59:58 PM »
Quote from: Likely Voter on March 08, 2016, 07:57:50 PM
Interesting that Sanders timed his rally for now. Does that mean that he has no plans to speak later? And if so, then that says they are assuming two losses.

Probably. It's going to be a rough night for Sanders.
Logged
indysaff
reapersaff
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 342
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.03, S: -5.91
« Reply #1 on: March 08, 2016, 08:04:59 PM »

Yuck
Logged
indysaff
reapersaff
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 342
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.03, S: -5.91
« Reply #2 on: March 08, 2016, 09:09:50 PM »
Quote from: Mr. Morden on March 08, 2016, 09:09:00 PM
Michigan exit poll:

http://edition.cnn.com/election/primaries/polls/mi/Dem

whites:
Sanders 59%
Clinton 39%

blacks:
Clinton 64%
Sanders 32%


Wow
Logged
indysaff
reapersaff
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 342
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.03, S: -5.91
« Reply #3 on: March 08, 2016, 09:13:15 PM »
Quote from: Invisible Obama on March 08, 2016, 09:12:18 PM
Quote from: Lt. Governor Smith (I-MA) on March 08, 2016, 09:09:22 PM
I find it hilarious how some Hillbots here accuse Sandernistas of being conspiracy theorists. Granted, it's completely true, but they have nuts like Invisible Obama who literally can't comprehend Sanders winning without some sort of conspiracy going on.
Sanders leading in Wayne County makes no sense. It would be quite suspect if he carried that county considering that he has done horribly with the black vote so far.

In the South, yes. This is different.
Logged
indysaff
reapersaff
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 342
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.03, S: -5.91
« Reply #4 on: March 08, 2016, 09:23:37 PM »
He's closing the gap in Macomb.
Logged
indysaff
reapersaff
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 342
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.03, S: -5.91
« Reply #5 on: March 08, 2016, 09:27:57 PM »
Wayne flipped
Logged
indysaff
reapersaff
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 342
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.03, S: -5.91
« Reply #6 on: March 08, 2016, 09:34:38 PM »
He's keeping it close in Oakland.
Logged
indysaff
reapersaff
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 342
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.03, S: -5.91
« Reply #7 on: March 08, 2016, 09:41:10 PM »
Quote from: Invisible Obama on March 08, 2016, 09:37:53 PM
This would actually only result in an even split of delegates and Sanders is still way behind in delegates. Clinton has over 1000 delegates all together and with this being a delegate game, even if Sanders does win Michigan, he won't get a delegate lead.

He'll have the momentum going forward, and if he ends up winning MI then that means his national numbers are really climbing like new nat polls have shown.
Logged
indysaff
reapersaff
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 342
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.03, S: -5.91
« Reply #8 on: March 08, 2016, 10:04:09 PM »
Detroit just closed the gap
Logged
indysaff
reapersaff
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 342
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.03, S: -5.91
« Reply #9 on: March 08, 2016, 10:08:54 PM »
50-48 now
Logged
indysaff
reapersaff
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 342
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.03, S: -5.91
« Reply #10 on: March 08, 2016, 10:11:49 PM »
It's going to be super close
Logged
indysaff
reapersaff
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 342
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.03, S: -5.91
« Reply #11 on: March 08, 2016, 10:22:51 PM »
His lead is holding in Macomb woooow
Logged
indysaff
reapersaff
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 342
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.03, S: -5.91
« Reply #12 on: March 08, 2016, 10:25:08 PM »
Anyone think he might flip Oakland?
Logged
indysaff
reapersaff
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 342
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.03, S: -5.91
« Reply #13 on: March 08, 2016, 10:41:46 PM »
That debate helped, he should be angry more often now.
Logged
indysaff
reapersaff
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 342
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.03, S: -5.91
« Reply #14 on: March 08, 2016, 10:49:22 PM »
Hes closing the gap in Wayne and leads in Macomb again.
Logged
indysaff
reapersaff
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 342
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.03, S: -5.91
« Reply #15 on: March 08, 2016, 10:54:47 PM »
Chuck Todd saying over 300,000 votes still not counted. That seems real high...
Logged
indysaff
reapersaff
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 342
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.03, S: -5.91
« Reply #16 on: March 08, 2016, 11:00:27 PM »
Quote from: Lt. Governor Smith (I-MA) on March 08, 2016, 10:59:01 PM
Quote from: Horus on March 08, 2016, 10:58:21 PM
I'd bet good money Sanders won under 30 blacks in Michigan.

How much do you consider good money? Because I do think that more than 30 black people voted for Sanders.

I think he means black voters under 30 years old.
Logged
indysaff
reapersaff
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 342
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.03, S: -5.91
« Reply #17 on: March 08, 2016, 11:02:06 PM »
Quote from: Invisible Obama on March 08, 2016, 11:01:15 PM
I'm still not sure why people are ignoring the delegate math here. This does not close the gap for Sanders, not even close.

It plays out well for him in future states.
Logged
indysaff
reapersaff
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 342
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.03, S: -5.91
« Reply #18 on: March 08, 2016, 11:07:05 PM »
Quote from: Invisible Obama on March 08, 2016, 11:04:58 PM
Quote from: reapersaff on March 08, 2016, 11:02:06 PM
Quote from: Invisible Obama on March 08, 2016, 11:01:15 PM
I'm still not sure why people are ignoring the delegate math here. This does not close the gap for Sanders, not even close.

It plays out well for him in future states.

Winning by margins that only results in a splitting delegates does not make up the delegate gap.

If he can pull an upset here, he can improve on his numbers elsewhere.
Logged
indysaff
reapersaff
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 342
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.03, S: -5.91
« Reply #19 on: March 08, 2016, 11:23:42 PM »
83% in Wayne, but only 44% in Kent. I dunno if it will be enough.
Logged
indysaff
reapersaff
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 342
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.03, S: -5.91
« Reply #20 on: March 08, 2016, 11:36:13 PM »
Fantastic news.
Logged
indysaff
reapersaff
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 342
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.03, S: -5.91
« Reply #21 on: March 09, 2016, 02:03:46 AM »
Wayne all in and its 49.9-48.2
Logged
indysaff
reapersaff
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 342
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.03, S: -5.91
« Reply #22 on: March 09, 2016, 02:09:07 AM »
Quote from: Arch on March 09, 2016, 02:06:19 AM

Once the rest clocks in, I think it's a clean 50% Sanders.

All that's left is Genesee and Berrien, Hillary leads in both.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.031 seconds with 13 queries.