im sure people will think this is a stupid question....but why exactly should feingold not be sworn in on the bible?
He's Jewish.
He could swear on the constitution or even the Torah perhaps?
Isn't the Torah nothing more than the Old Testament section of the Holy Bible? If so, then the Bible would represent the combined traditions of both the Jewish and Christian faiths, and technically the Torah would already be incorporated into it in the form of the Old Testament.
Therefore, I do not see any reason why Russ Feingold would find it objectionable to be sworn in on the Holy Bible as tradition dictates.
