NC-Bloomberg/Selzer: Clinton +1, Clinton +1 (3-way) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 14, 2024, 07:39:26 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  NC-Bloomberg/Selzer: Clinton +1, Clinton +1 (3-way) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: NC-Bloomberg/Selzer: Clinton +1, Clinton +1 (3-way)  (Read 2864 times)
Shadows
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,956
« on: October 03, 2016, 02:10:00 PM »

Romney did not win NC by a landslide or 5-6%. He barely won it with around 1%. 2008 Obama won NC. NC has been very close, the last 2 elections Now it is obvious that the dufus Trump has fallen nationally by 3-4-5% odd maybe. So isn't it obvious NC would shift from +1/+2 Trump to +1/+2/+3 Clinton?

Some of the comments are hilarious & the reasons I call people Super pac trolls. 1-2-3% Margin is no big deal. At any time if Trump keeps his discipline, has strong debates & Hillary screws up or wikileaks reveals something terrible, anytime there can be a 3-4% swing.

If Trump could lose 3-4% in 1 week, then why can he not gain 3-4%? It is clearly that Ohio is tilt Republican at this point, Florida varies from toss-up to tilt Democrat, NC is a toss-up! None of theses states are settled!

The states which tend to have big swings are CO, PA. These states could go from Clinton +1/+2 (Close to a toss-up at best for Trump) to suddenly +11/+12, the later is ideally the margin a Democrat should win with!
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 11 queries.