Harry Reid and Alan Grayson spar, Reid: "I want you [Grayson] to lose" (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 15, 2024, 03:01:53 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Harry Reid and Alan Grayson spar, Reid: "I want you [Grayson] to lose" (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Harry Reid and Alan Grayson spar, Reid: "I want you [Grayson] to lose"  (Read 1779 times)
Heisenberg
SecureAmerica
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,112
United States


« on: May 11, 2016, 09:28:00 PM »

Wow. Reid sure is losing it. I remember some time ago he said he wanted Grayson to drop out. Of course, Reid has said something much, much worse, about a candidate in his own state.
Logged
Heisenberg
SecureAmerica
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,112
United States


« Reply #1 on: May 11, 2016, 11:56:47 PM »

Honestly, I agree with Reid here, and I certainly wouldn't be surprised if the Floridems nominate Grayson and ruin a chance at a Senate pickup.
Clinton carried the state with ease, how's Grayson going to do substantially better than Sanders?
The primary is on August 30, separate from the presidential primary. It will come down to turnout, and campaigning.
Logged
Heisenberg
SecureAmerica
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,112
United States


« Reply #2 on: May 15, 2016, 04:15:22 PM »

I prefer Murphy to Grayson but Reid should of stated opposition to Grayson better.I am assured that Murphy will come out on top in Nov
I'm not sure. I hope Republicans can attack Murphy on the corruption and connections to the corrupt Ami Bera.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 12 queries.