2020 Nebraska Redistricting (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 12:04:11 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  2020 Nebraska Redistricting (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 2020 Nebraska Redistricting  (Read 7353 times)
Virginiá
Virginia
Administratrix
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,916
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.97, S: -5.91

WWW
« on: September 25, 2021, 08:49:15 PM »

Both NE and ME should get rid of the split electoral votes, it's bad politics and will tear this country apart if other states try it.

Agreed.  It's Pandora's Box for democracy.  If NE and ME keep splitting their votes regularly, someone will eventually try this in a large, urbanized state with gerrymandered CD lines.

That might finally wake Dems up regarding the importance of winning governorships and state legislatures in key swing states.

They did win key governorships in a number of swing states, though. WI, MI, PA, NC, NV. ME, MN as well. Democrats suffer more at the state level due to the fact that there are more Republican-leaning states than not, and hyper-polarization means there is usually a hard ceiling for many of these states. Democrats seemed to learn a number of lessons in the Trump era, but the fact is, with the country being the way it is right now, they can only do so well in otherwise hostile territory. Money, campaigning and organizing only gets you so far. After a certain point, it doesn't matter how much of either you have/do, it's not going to win you a state legislature if a comfortable majority of the state hates your guts.
Logged
Virginiá
Virginia
Administratrix
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,916
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.97, S: -5.91

WWW
« Reply #1 on: September 26, 2021, 09:08:29 PM »

Why exactly does it matter if a presidential candidate visits more states these days? If you allocate by Congressional district, you're also incentivizing which districts and thus which voters these candidates cater to in their campaigns. No Republican is going to believe they have a chance at winning urban or inner ring suburban districts, and they will cater more towards their strongest bases of supports - exurban / rural districts. Vice versa for Democrats.

If anything, this just further orients political campaigns in the direction of existing trends and focuses their attention in, rather than out - the opposite of what is intended.

Also, you know, partisan gerrymandering and geographical biases. Why would we want to let those problems infect yet another part of the federal government? What benefits does this system have that are so important as to deepen existing structural biases that are already hurting trust & faith in our electoral system?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 12 queries.