2018 Gubernatorial Rankings (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 15, 2024, 11:55:24 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  2018 Gubernatorial Rankings (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 2018 Gubernatorial Rankings  (Read 46007 times)
Virginiá
Virginia
Administratrix
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,921
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.97, S: -5.91

WWW
« on: November 28, 2016, 12:42:50 PM »

My thoughts, feel free to criticize. I'll include thoughts on leg races too

AL: Safe R. It'll be interesting here if Strange goes for Senate rather than Gov as expected - could be a free for all on GOP side. Not that it matters. Leg obviously Safe R
AK: Lean I. I think Walker pulls it out with his quirky coalition he's built here. Goofiness ensues in legislature, very unpredictable
AR: Hutch seems popular, no issue there. Leg is beyond Safe R
AZ: Could get interesting in Mauricio's. Is the AZ Senate close enough for D gains? I think yes, though short of a flip. Ducey could be vulnerable to a Stanton run. There are some row offices young Democrats could line up to challenge, too, though many GOP row officers seem pretty moderate.
CA: Likely D, if only because of Top Two. Leg should stay supermajority, perhaps even grow.
CO: Lean D. I think Ds should be favored to take back trifecta and I'll predict them to win 1 row office
CT: Tossup if Malloy runs, Lean D if he's smart and doesn't. Maybe Himes jumps in? Dems should win a seat or two to regain breathing room in Senate
FL: Tossup/Tilt R: Only because the D bench is crap. I think Gwen Graham makes a solid recruit though and Dems could narrow GOP majorities in the legislature. Maybe 1 row office gets picked off too
GA: Lean R due to runoff. The GOP primary will be nuts. Leg could narrow, maybe Dems get 1 row office with a good recruit and flop on GOP side. Does Carter run again?
HI: utterly Safe D. Can't Rs win back a Senate seat?
ID: Safe R, obviously
IL: Lean D. Best pickup opportunity IMO. Maybe Dems can expand leg margins again too
IA: Tilt R. I expect Reynolds to be the next Governor here. Dems scrape back some seats in leg, probably not enough to flip either
KS: Tilt R. Will be interesting with Brownback so radioactive. Svaty could be a strong contender
ME: who the f knows. I doubt Collins runs. Poliquin would be a strong GOP recruit. I'll say Dems flip the legislature
MD: Tossup/Tilt D: I know Hogan is popular but I see Delaney running and winning, albeit narrowly. Dems grow leg margins
MA: Tossup/Tilt R: Mass loves it some moderate R guvnahs, and Setti Warren seems a lower tier recruit
MI: Tilt D. I think Whitmer wins narrowly. Dems retake House and narrow margins in Senate, maybe flip a row office or two
MN: Lean D. Swanson runs strong in outer state and Dems sweep row offices again. Flip at least one chamber if not both.
NE: Likely R. I know Rockets is basically Brownback north but who runs? Do Dems focus on Senate first
NH: Too early to say. This place swings like crazy.
NM: Likely D. Udall or Balderas would dominate.
NV: Likely D. Don't think GOP has anyone like Sandoval left. Calculus changes if Heller runs, though I doubt he does
NY: Likely D. Hopefully Bharara primaries Cuomo. This could be the year Democrats flip the Senate.
OH: Tossup/Tilt R. I think it'll be narrow, but Republicans win. Leg margins tighten narrowly
OK: Likely R. It'd be interesting if Boren runs, which I doubt
PA: Likely D. Think Wolf runs again and wins. Dems narrow disadvantage in legislature.
Ri: Likelu D. Raimondo wins again, though there could be a primary.
SC: Safe R without an open seat.
SD: Likely R. I think Jackley wins primary.
WI: Tossup. Does the Walker/WOW machine carry the day? Is Walker running again? He'll be the top target for Democrats. Leg depends on what happens with this lawsuit that just went down. Could see a big year here for Team D.
WY: Hahahhaa

This list seems good to me, with the exception of a few:

Maryland (Leans R): I'm not convinced Democrats can knock off an incumbent Gov who is this popular. Perhaps if they can find a way to make him more unpopular? If there is a ginormous wave, perhaps he gets swept away anyway.

Nevada (Tossup): Honestly it's hard for me to give Democrats anything better than a toss-up on this. They have had an amazing inability to win a gubernatorial race here in literally almost a generation now. I'm not saying they definitely can't because they haven't in so long, but that I'm less inclined to believe it's an automatic win, even in a wave.

I'm not too bullish on IA or OH either, but no other comments on them. Overall I do not think 2018 will be kind to Republicans for numerous reasons, so to me it's just a matter of how bad.
Logged
Virginiá
Virginia
Administratrix
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,921
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.97, S: -5.91

WWW
« Reply #1 on: June 15, 2018, 08:00:12 PM »

Maddox is obviously a much stronger candidate than Valdez, but I just really can't see him winning in any scenario. The problem with predicting Maddox's victory is more than just the fact that he's running in one of the most solidly Republican states in the US that also happens to be one of the least elastic. Alabama is one of the only states that I don't see the national "blue wave" environment helping the Democrats much in. Trump's approval ratings in Alabama have been hovering around 60%: appeals to the anti-Trump vote will actually be counterproductive there by encouraging pro-Trump turnout. And before you mention Doug Jones, I'm willing to bet Jones would've lost if the election had taken place as part of the regular election cycle without peculiar special election turnout like the gubernatorial election will, not to mention Kay Ivey is on another plane of existence in terms of candidate quality compared to Roy Moore.

I'm not optimistic about Democrats winning another high profile statewide office in Alabama, but the Senate special election had more votes cast in it than the 2014 Governor's race. It was a couple hundred thousand more too.

Special elections can have really low turnout that favors the party that is most energized, but in high profile special elections that involve a lot of money and attention, turnout can approach or surpass general election turnout. This has been the case for numerous US House special elections since 2016 as well.
Logged
Virginiá
Virginia
Administratrix
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,921
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.97, S: -5.91

WWW
« Reply #2 on: June 15, 2018, 09:05:01 PM »

The thing about turnout in the Alabama special wasn't that it was low, it was that it was lopsided. Turnout was severely depressed in Republican areas and high in Democratic areas. Moore had the percentage of his base voting for him over Jones he needed to win, but he didn't have the percentage of his base voting at all he needed, if that makes sense.

Perhaps - but is there any guarantee that would not happen to some extent in a general election, even if the people turn out but leave it blank for Senate? I mean, look back to 2012, Moore barely won in a high turnout election if I recall correctly. You don't need low or lopsided turnout to win in Alabama if the candidate is messed up enough.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 11 queries.