Most of the specifics actually said were standard talking points like the minimum wage. Nobody had a concrete plan for anything.
There isn't enough time to be comprehensive about anything really. They give the gist, and the voter should go on each candidate's websites and do research of their own. There is only so much the candidates themselves can address in a debate. It's not realistic to expect them not to throw jabs at each other, which further reduces time to be substantive.
I didn't watch the debate, but it's nice to read all the comments on how well Hillary did.
hermit!! WATCH IT!
You have to. It's the first debate of the weirdest election in modern history. You can't not watch it!
Poll
