The utter irrelevance of "more Republicans than Democrats voted for the CRA" (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 05, 2024, 05:32:29 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  The utter irrelevance of "more Republicans than Democrats voted for the CRA" (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: The utter irrelevance of "more Republicans than Democrats voted for the CRA"  (Read 1374 times)
Virginiá
Virginia
Administratrix
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,919
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.97, S: -5.91

WWW
« on: April 25, 2016, 09:44:16 PM »
« edited: April 25, 2016, 09:46:19 PM by Virginia »

How is it irrelevant?  It's as relevant as Bayer and Volkswagen's Nazi connection.  Southerners didn't join the GOP because of racism.  Don't believe me?

Exit polls from the 70s and 80s consistently show that the most Republican voters in the South were young voters, not former Dixiecrats.  And the South continued to elect Democrats long after the CRA was passed.

http://www.claremont.org/crb/article/the-myth-of-the-racist-republicans/
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/386257/myth-republican-racism-mona-charen
http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/300432/party-civil-rights-kevin-d-williamson

This is a decent read so far (Claremont), but I didn't see anything about exit polls in it. I don't have time to read the entire thing tonight, but I searched those articles for "poll" and came up with nothing for exit polls showing young Republican voters. The Claremont article spells out a different story for why the South began switching - Such as transplants from other states who brought Republican-leaning voting patterns with them (similar to what is happening with Colorado and Virginia right now), and the GOP attracting middle class suburbanites in the peripheral southern states. That means existing adult southern Democratic voters in those peripheral states did switch, but not necessarily due to racist platitudes.

However, to be fair to your point, even without the data I'd say young voters in those states that were attracted to the GOP at a young age powered the Republican party's continued success in the region. Young adults in their 20s tend to have their dominant political views and affiliations "imprinted" and usually stay loyal for most of their life, barring any major events that break those bonds. Evidently, these same voters also voted Democratic at the local/state level for various reasons. Local politics differ from national politics and it can sometimes take a state a long, long time to move from one party to the next at the state level. Consider Virginia, who stopped voting Democratic for president in the 50s (save for LBJ), yet they remained mostly Democratic in state/local politics up until the 90s - Though you could see the cracks forming in the 70s. Mississippi was strongly Democratic until the 90s, and had a Democratic legislature up until 2010. Basically the same thing for most southern states, to varying degrees.

The reason I say all that is because it begs the question of how you define "switch to Republicans" (or vice versa).

Anyway, thanks for the Claremont link! I'm going to finish it tomorrow.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 12 queries.