UT-Dan Jones & Associates: Trump loses to both Clinton and Sanders (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 22, 2024, 10:39:10 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  UT-Dan Jones & Associates: Trump loses to both Clinton and Sanders (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: UT-Dan Jones & Associates: Trump loses to both Clinton and Sanders  (Read 6646 times)
Virginiá
Virginia
Administratrix
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,909
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.97, S: -5.91

WWW
« on: March 20, 2016, 02:12:22 PM »

If the Clinton machine legitimately thinks Utah is a viable target this summer/fall, then we will see her put resources into that state. Given that they do lots of polling and have other sources of information on this, them contesting the state would be a pretty damning sign imo.
Logged
Virginiá
Virginia
Administratrix
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,909
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.97, S: -5.91

WWW
« Reply #1 on: March 20, 2016, 02:25:00 PM »

So, he will be in a unique position to win the EC and lose the PV badly.

Honestly, that is a real stretch. The kind of PV margins you are probably talking about would be unprecedented in combination with an EV win. The popular vote can deviate a bit but in general it does stay at least somewhat close to EV outcomes. And before anyone says "this election cycle has been so far out of the norm that anything is possible!", it's worth noting that there are limits and using that blanket excuse is a bad argument.

I sure as hell wouldn't bank on such an outcome.
Logged
Virginiá
Virginia
Administratrix
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,909
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.97, S: -5.91

WWW
« Reply #2 on: March 20, 2016, 03:02:56 PM »

Virginia, we know that his base are white low education males and working class voters (whites and others). These are disproportionally concentrated in PA, MI and OH. I don't see why he couldn't win there by small margins and yet lose elsewhere by a lot bigger margins and lose the PV, but win the EV.

Right, but him over-performing with certain groups in certain areas will also be balanced out by Clinton over-performing with groups that repudiate Trump. This will bring more balance to the PV. Trump, or really most plausible candidates at that, generally cannot over-perform so significantly as to create a large lopsided PV/EV result.

But I'll be clear - If this outcome prediction in UT bears fruit, then there isn't any reason that Trump couldn't theoretically pull a similar win somewhere else. I will give you that, but I'm just saying that to create a large deviation from PV/EV result is highly unlikely.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 10 queries.