Democrats are surprisingly NOT dependent on minority votes to win (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 24, 2024, 09:08:00 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Democrats are surprisingly NOT dependent on minority votes to win (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Democrats are surprisingly NOT dependent on minority votes to win  (Read 3180 times)
This account no longer in use.
cxs018
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,282


« on: May 22, 2016, 01:29:09 PM »

Black voters are going to make the difference in FL, OH, VA and PA if Clinton wins. And Hispanic voters will make the difference in NV, CO and NM. To say that Clinton is not dependent on minority voters is ridiculous. But then again, "Angrie" is probably one of those NH Democrats who wants the Democratic party to be a "White women only" party. That's why you support Climbing Maggie, right, Angrie?

B-b-but angry NH women!
Logged
This account no longer in use.
cxs018
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,282


« Reply #1 on: May 22, 2016, 01:36:29 PM »

Angrie, you should just ignore TNVolunteer. From what I've heard, he was a huge fan of Scott Brown in 2014, and when Brown lost, he needed an excuse on why Shaheen won. Thus, the angry NH women theory was born.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 13 queries.