Will the Paid Speech Question followed by LBGT Rights damage Clinton's campaign? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 20, 2024, 06:29:31 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Will the Paid Speech Question followed by LBGT Rights damage Clinton's campaign? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Will the Paid Speech Question followed by LBGT Rights damage Clinton's campaign?  (Read 2834 times)
This account no longer in use.
cxs018
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,282


« on: February 19, 2016, 11:41:49 AM »

Probably an audience plant. I'm not even saying that sarcastically.
Logged
This account no longer in use.
cxs018
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,282


« Reply #1 on: February 19, 2016, 01:59:58 PM »

Although Sanders is a much better LGBT+ advocate, I believe that Clinton has redeemed herself on this issue, and that you should stop calling her out for it.
Logged
This account no longer in use.
cxs018
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,282


« Reply #2 on: February 19, 2016, 08:03:41 PM »

DOMA was an evil bill & Clinton should not have signed it - It set gay rights for a generation.

And the problem is not just 1996 but in 2007 she said the same when Obama openly said he supported Gay Marriage she said in a very brutal way "Marriage is between a man & a woman". It was much worse than Mitt Romney coming when it is coming from a so-called "Progressive" " No Champion of Gay Rights" Democrat candidate in 2007 when the other guy has supported it.

This was 2007, not 1996. She only turned in 2013 - when the whole country changed.

Does she deserve the gay vote over a candidate who was talking on GOP in 1995 for anti-gay speeches or voting against DOMA.

Are you completely illiterate? Read my post again.

I read that dumb post of yours & it was a pile of BS

For onceAs usual, I can agree with the Bernie hacks.

Fixed.

Please don't tell me you're accusing Higgs of being a hack now.
Logged
This account no longer in use.
cxs018
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,282


« Reply #3 on: February 20, 2016, 02:28:35 PM »

DOMA was an evil bill & Clinton should not have signed it - It set gay rights for a generation.

And the problem is not just 1996 but in 2007 she said the same when Obama openly said he supported Gay Marriage she said in a very brutal way "Marriage is between a man & a woman". It was much worse than Mitt Romney coming when it is coming from a so-called "Progressive" " No Champion of Gay Rights" Democrat candidate in 2007 when the other guy has supported it.

This was 2007, not 1996. She only turned in 2013 - when the whole country changed.

Does she deserve the gay vote over a candidate who was talking on GOP in 1995 for anti-gay speeches or voting against DOMA.

Are you completely illiterate? Read my post again.

I read that dumb post of yours & it was a pile of BS

For onceAs usual, I can agree with the Bernie hacks.

Fixed.

Lol, I guess I'm a Bernie hack now

Nope, just a Republican hack propping up the man you hope will be easier to beat at the general.

You are acting utterly delusional. I have not seen any evidence of Higgs being a hack for anybody.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 13 queries.