Santorum says electing Cruz will lead to "Polygamy" (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 24, 2024, 07:14:19 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Santorum says electing Cruz will lead to "Polygamy" (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Santorum says electing Cruz will lead to "Polygamy"  (Read 4707 times)
wolfsblood07
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 656
United States


« on: January 02, 2016, 02:27:52 PM »

Wow!  I did not think there was a smidgen of room to get to the right of Ted Cruz on a social issue!  I am impressed, and hope that this marks a real push toward banning SSM.  
When I heard Cruz discuss this as a states rights issue, I felt that was as good as it would ever get and I supported it.  Now I say, go Santorum!  
Logged
wolfsblood07
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 656
United States


« Reply #1 on: January 02, 2016, 02:54:37 PM »

Wow!  I did not think there was a smidgen of room to get to the right of Ted Cruz on a social issue!  I am impressed, and hope that this marks a real push toward banning SSM.  
When I heard Cruz discuss this as a states rights issue, I felt that was as good as it would ever get and I supported it.  Now I say, go Santorum!  

Hope this is sarcasm...
Not sarcasm!
Reading the article has pumped me up!  After seeing so many gay flag rainbows all over social media last summer, this is a hopeful sign.  I am glad I sent Santorum a contribution, even though it was small every bit helps.
Logged
wolfsblood07
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 656
United States


« Reply #2 on: January 02, 2016, 03:06:16 PM »

Why is it trolling to post support for what Santorum said?  I think a lot of people here agree with it.
Cruz and Santorum have both given EXCELLENT interviews on this subject.  Santorum talked about it with Rachel Maddow some months back.  It's about tradition and the definition and purpose of marriage.
Logged
wolfsblood07
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 656
United States


« Reply #3 on: January 02, 2016, 03:23:07 PM »

Marriage is one man, one woman.  Gay people have been getting traditional marriages for eons, and having kids.  That is wonderful, if they choose to do so.  But now we have this radical, leftist cultural shift that started in the 90s, that says we have to accept new definitions to accommodate everyone, lest we hurt someone's feelings!  Once that starts, look out.  Pretty soon, what was once unthinkable becomes law, no matter what the people say or what natural law says. 
Logged
wolfsblood07
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 656
United States


« Reply #4 on: January 02, 2016, 09:16:05 PM »

Marriage is one man, one woman.  Gay people have been getting traditional marriages for eons, and having kids.  That is wonderful, if they choose to do so.  But now we have this radical, leftist cultural shift that started in the 90s, that says we have to accept new definitions to accommodate everyone, lest we hurt someone's feelings!  Once that starts, look out.  Pretty soon, what was once unthinkable becomes law, no matter what the people say or what natural law says. 

It's "wonderful" when gay people are forced to remain in the closet and enter into loveless sham marriages???
Those marriages may not be loveless.  A guy gets married and realizes how great it is to have a sweet, adoring, perky goddess of a wife to cuddle with and take her shopping for dresses and shoes!  These guys are cured!  That's why traditional marriage is sacred.
Logged
wolfsblood07
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 656
United States


« Reply #5 on: January 02, 2016, 11:21:31 PM »

Marriage is one man, one woman.  Gay people have been getting traditional marriages for eons, and having kids.  That is wonderful, if they choose to do so.  But now we have this radical, leftist cultural shift that started in the 90s, that says we have to accept new definitions to accommodate everyone, lest we hurt someone's feelings!  Once that starts, look out.  Pretty soon, what was once unthinkable becomes law, no matter what the people say or what natural law says. 
The majority of people say differently.

No, only a majority of the SCOTUS Justices say differently.  The rest of us haven't been polled lately.  Although I do believe that a majority of Americans are at least OK with SSM now that it is a fait accompli, that wasn't the results of the majority of referenda that had been held prior to that.
Fuzzy Bear makes good points.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 13 queries.