Petition to ban Woody/Sir Woodbury (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 18, 2024, 09:09:19 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Forum Community
  Forum Community (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, YE, KoopaDaQuick 🇵🇸)
  Petition to ban Woody/Sir Woodbury (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Should Woody be banned?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 0

Author Topic: Petition to ban Woody/Sir Woodbury  (Read 1425 times)
heatcharger
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,603
Sweden


Political Matrix
E: -1.04, S: -0.24

« on: May 16, 2024, 10:14:46 AM »

PSOL, jaichind, pppolitics, Sir woodbury, it’s interesting that the people who get banned or requested to be so are ALWAYS exactly the ones that don’t make this forum a full echo chamber where people only say boring variations of the same thing.

In some cases, like pppolitics, they were never treated as “problematic” before they happened to vocally disagree with the majority crowd on ONE single issue. It would be much more honest if TOS was updated to include which political stances are allowed to exist instead of people inventing weak reasons to justify getting rid of people they disagree with.
Funny how BRTD, T'Chenka, and myself have managed to be critical of Israel and not deemed “problematic” over it. Wonder why 🧐

lol
Logged
heatcharger
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,603
Sweden


Political Matrix
E: -1.04, S: -0.24

« Reply #1 on: May 16, 2024, 01:34:58 PM »

PSOL, jaichind, pppolitics, Sir woodbury, it’s interesting that the people who get banned or requested to be so are ALWAYS exactly the ones that don’t make this forum a full echo chamber where people only say boring variations of the same thing.

In some cases, like pppolitics, they were never treated as “problematic” before they happened to vocally disagree with the majority crowd on ONE single issue. It would be much more honest if TOS was updated to include which political stances are allowed to exist instead of people inventing weak reasons to justify getting rid of people they disagree with.
Funny how BRTD, T'Chenka, and myself have managed to be critical of Israel and not deemed “problematic” over it. Wonder why 🧐

lol
What? No call for any of our bans over Israel commentary or even accused us of antisemitism like in pppolitics case unless someone did that I missed

It’s a left-wing blog
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 13 queries.