Politico: GA special election will be most expensive House race in U.S history (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 31, 2024, 06:46:04 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Politico: GA special election will be most expensive House race in U.S history (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Politico: GA special election will be most expensive House race in U.S history  (Read 1843 times)
heatcharger
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,525
Sweden


Political Matrix
E: -1.04, S: -0.24

« on: May 06, 2017, 04:58:05 PM »

Sad how much money Democrats are spending on some bland candidate in a district that is more Democratic than the median district.

This bland candidate is doing much better in this district than some random Berniecrat you would've rallied behind.
Logged
heatcharger
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,525
Sweden


Political Matrix
E: -1.04, S: -0.24

« Reply #1 on: May 06, 2017, 05:37:13 PM »

My opinion of Jon Ossoff isn't at all related to Sanders' comments regarding his questionable progressive credentials or whatnot; after all, Sanders and OR have made plenty of questionable endorsements in the past. That being said, the fact that the Democratic Party is putting far more resources into a seat like GA-06 as opposed to somewhere like Montana is a testament to how far the party has fallen.

A district that swings 22 points left is called fertile territory. Besides, winning a marginal Trump district like this one means much more to the collective chances of Democrats taking back the House in 2018. Ossoff has also proved himself to be a much better candidate than Quist has, objectively speaking.

Yes, I know Democrats have had success winning statewide in Montana, but the ones who have weren't unabashed left-wingers. Bullock hardly qualifies as one, Schweitzer picked a Republican for his running mate, and let's not get started on Baucus. My point is, the future of the Democratic Party won't be restricted from places like Montana, but it certainly isn't where the base will be.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 11 queries.