Is this good analysis? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 09:46:48 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Is this good analysis? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Is this good analysis?  (Read 2185 times)
heatcharger
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,525
Sweden


Political Matrix
E: -1.04, S: -0.24

« on: September 10, 2016, 10:22:23 AM »

This really must be your first election.
Logged
heatcharger
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,525
Sweden


Political Matrix
E: -1.04, S: -0.24

« Reply #1 on: September 10, 2016, 07:09:49 PM »
« Edited: September 10, 2016, 07:11:32 PM by heatcharger »

Remove NH (youre welcome TN Volunteer). Swap CO and NV. That's a more likely map than this. Wisconsin is more likely than colorado at this point. (hopefully that will change)

B-b-b-but then Trump only has 266 electoral votes. Him, TNVol, and ER can only create maps where Trump wins.

They think Trump "starts" with 242 EV's,  while in reality he starts with about ~150.

Yeah, it's sad how they think FL, OH, NC, and IA are already in the bag for them in a "close and competitive election" even though polling shows NC might be just as Democratic as the nation.

Don't worry, Mr. 'Independent', I'll change my prediction soon enough if I think Trump is going to lose. Smiley

I'll hold you to it Mr. 'Other'. Smiley I'm still trying to figure out why your political matrix score is left-leaning.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 11 queries.