538: The GOP’s Chances Of Holding The Senate Are Following Trump Downhill (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 04, 2024, 03:52:41 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  538: The GOP’s Chances Of Holding The Senate Are Following Trump Downhill (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 538: The GOP’s Chances Of Holding The Senate Are Following Trump Downhill  (Read 1438 times)
heatcharger
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,541
Sweden


Political Matrix
E: -1.04, S: -0.24

« on: August 16, 2016, 11:15:46 AM »

In the end, all but maybe two or so of the competitive Senate races will break to the Dems (if I had to guess, AZ and OH will be the two seats the GOP keeps). Dems are looking at a net gain of 8-10 right now.

lol

IL, WI, IN, NH, PA, FL, NC, and OH/AZ/MO. I think getting one of the last three is quite difficult, but it's certainly plausible.
Logged
heatcharger
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,541
Sweden


Political Matrix
E: -1.04, S: -0.24

« Reply #1 on: August 16, 2016, 03:17:45 PM »

People forget how unpopular both of these candidates are. Trump is such a bad candidate that split-ticket voting will be at record levels by default, like in 1996. Most incumbents simply don't lose by wide margins, unless they're Blanche Lincoln.

In 2008, there was a backlash against pretty much all Republicans and the entire GOP. That is not the case this year.

No one said anything about wide margins. This is also not 1996. The Republican Party will not be able to detach themselves from the nominee no matter how hard they try. You're only fooling yourself if you think that's possible.

Also there's no denying Democrats have higher turnout in presidential years. That, combined with a potential depressed Republican turnout (there's real evidence of this), anonymous backbenchers like Blunt and Burr can get washed away in a wave.
Logged
heatcharger
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,541
Sweden


Political Matrix
E: -1.04, S: -0.24

« Reply #2 on: August 16, 2016, 05:23:19 PM »

McCain is far more vulnerable than Burr, I think he's probably the slight underdog at this point tbh.

I don't think so. A number of advantages Ross has over Kirkpatrick:

  • Democrats have had more success in NC than AZ
  • African-American turnout is more reliable than Latino turnout
  • Unpopular GOP governor to run against
  • Clinton campaign has already been in NC for months, haven't been focused on AZ much at all yet

Is McCain vulnerable? Absolutely. But the fundamentals of Arizona have me wary of it as a possible pickup.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 10 queries.