The Official January 2016 Southern Legislative Debate

[Ex-Assemblyman Steelers]

Ladies and gentlemen, dear Southerners
i am very happy that this debate held in our great state .  As i said already last legislative was very active and i am very proud for being part of that.
In next election we are in danger that Southeast Assembly become more conservative then last one.
From myself i can promise to be even more active then now.

[Ex-Assemblyman Steelers]

Its a very sad that all what fellow Southerners heard till now about this main issue is cut taxes, throw out government from jobs and private sector and so on. My opinion about this is very simple, those who exploit our resources (people, land,  natural resources etc. ) must pay for it.

How to bring jobs to the Southeast?
We must improve our infrastructure, this is main condition for making Southeast competitive for investments. Also what i heard here from my opponents, how we must reduce labor rights. This is absolutely intolerable and i will always be a staunch fighter against this.
We need to improve and subsidies green jobs and energetic jobs from renewable resources and that is only sector when we need to cut taxes for those who make jobs.

[Ex-Assemblyman Steelers]

All of you my fellow Southerners knows very well my standings about this question. I was against this bill from the beginning and i will stay against till the end. This bill proposal are regressive and return our democracy for the decades in past. All progressive forces not only in our region, but in whole Atlasia must unite against this bill.
Ladies and gentleman, my honest opinion is that this matter must be resolved between pregnant women and her doctor and not between Mr. Haslam, Mr. Pingvin and me.
Thank you, very much.

[Ex-Assemblyman Steelers]

I am pretty much satisfied with how our present Constitution determined rights of regions and federal government.

[Ex-Assemblyman Steelers]

First of all i must agree with Mr. Young conservative, we cant allow sexual assaulters from abroad becouse we dont know what to do with our own. I am a little bit ironic.
I was deeply against quotas which offered Mr. State secretary, because they was religiously inappropriate and they cover a small number refugees from Syria. If we want to be World power and simulate world policeman we must take responsibilities.
I understand that we can't accept all refugees who try to escape war areas but we can not allow ourselves to be like Catholic fundamentalist states like Poland or Slovakia and making quotas by religion.

[Ex-Assemblyman Steelers]

I am always for more people in politics, but when we attract more citizens then this will possible. In this moment this number is enough.

[Ex-Assemblyman Steelers]

As i said on previous response, i am always for more people in politics. If we have a number of people who want to work for South i am always for give them a chance. Of course that doesnt mean that we must destroy democratic process of election. Maybe in next elections we had a less candidates or more. So for now i am for this amendment.

[Ex-Assemblyman Steelers]

First of all i want to thank Senator Truman for leading this great debate, then i want to congratulate to my colleagues for participating i dont have doubts that South has a great future.
And in the end my fellow Southerners, you saw everything said and offered and last word will be yours.