Why a Republican response for the '96 State Of The Union? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 03, 2024, 06:03:59 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Why a Republican response for the '96 State Of The Union? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why a Republican response for the '96 State Of The Union?  (Read 644 times)
Bandit3 the Worker
Populist3
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,963


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92

« on: August 23, 2006, 09:25:12 PM »

Why did the networks air a Republican response to Clinton's 1996 State Of The Union speech?

The speech itself was conservative. Why a conservative response to a conservative speech?

Were there any stations that had the guts to air a liberal response, as they should have done? If I was a station manager, I would have had the network feed cut after the speech so a liberal response could be provided instead of more conservative crap.
Logged
Bandit3 the Worker
Populist3
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,963


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92

« Reply #1 on: August 23, 2006, 10:03:36 PM »

Because this is a two party country, whether we like that or not.

Then Clinton should have been giving us an alternative to the Republicans instead of just parroting the Republicans' failed ideas.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Overall, maybe he wasn't as bad as the Republicans, but that particular speech was. If I read the speech, without knowing it was a Clinton speech, I would have just assumed it was a Republican speech.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 12 queries.