Were there any big cities in the South pre-1860? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 13, 2024, 12:04:48 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Were there any big cities in the South pre-1860? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Were there any big cities in the South pre-1860?  (Read 12824 times)
Bandit3 the Worker
Populist3
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,964


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92
« on: September 15, 2014, 08:02:53 PM »
Quote from: politicus on September 14, 2014, 10:17:25 AM
Kentucky had some industry and Louisville was a real city. Do you have the numbers for that?

EDIT: Wikipedia says it was the 10th largest city in the country in 1850, but they don't give the numbers.

Covington was big too.
Logged
Bandit3 the Worker
Populist3
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,964


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92
« Reply #1 on: September 22, 2014, 10:03:32 AM »
How can you have a state without any cities?
Logged
Bandit3 the Worker
Populist3
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,964


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92
« Reply #2 on: September 22, 2014, 10:49:59 AM »
Quote from: Sol on September 22, 2014, 10:42:45 AM
Quote from: Bandit3 the Worker on September 22, 2014, 10:03:32 AM
How can you have a state without any cities?

You can easily have a state without big cities.

In 1820, there were 7 states that didn't have any cities - big or small. How is it possible that, say, Dover DE wasn't a city?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 10 queries.