Will future primaries have a new requirement? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 03, 2024, 12:15:46 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Process (Moderator: muon2)
  Will future primaries have a new requirement? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Will future primaries have a new requirement?  (Read 4817 times)
SillyAmerican
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,052
United States


« on: October 14, 2015, 07:17:25 PM »

Regardless if Trump wins the GOP primary or not, his run this cycle will surely have an impact on future primaries. Since Trump has never held a governmental office, will one or both parties make it a requirement that you must have held some form of office before you are eligible to run for office? Would it become an amendment to the Constitution instead? If so, how would people react and would it be struck down as unconstitutional?

Could the parties really make such a rule? The parties have way too much control over our system of choosing leaders as it is. We really should be trying to figure out how to get rid of the party system; it's ineffective and has led to hyper-partisanship (and, ultimately, huge problems with our elected officials being able to govern). Bottom line is that the reason Mr. Trump and the other non-politicians are currently enjoying such huge poll numbers is that the electorate is tired of having people they elect to represent them completely forget who it is they work for. Once in office, politicians on both sides of the aisle become more worried about raising money and blocking the activities of the opposition than getting anything done and actually governing. Perhaps that's the root problem that should be addressed, not the fact that Mr. Trump, Dr. Carson, and Mrs. Fiorina have no political experience...
Logged
SillyAmerican
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,052
United States


« Reply #1 on: October 14, 2015, 09:03:50 PM »

There's not a way to get rid of parties. People will organize into communities of interest no matter what.

Communities are fine, but when the money starts getting big, and those "communities" start making rules about who's in and who's out, and the implications start to hurt the nation as a whole, it becomes time to look at alternatives. In my opinion, the No Labels (http://www.nolabels.org/) and Open Primaries (http://www.openprimaries.org/) organizations represent steps in the right direction...
Logged
SillyAmerican
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,052
United States


« Reply #2 on: October 16, 2015, 11:03:06 AM »

The Democrats very, very, rarely feature prominent candidates who haven't ever held office. It's more of a problem with the GOP.

Al Sharpton, Wesley "Imprison American Citizens" Clark, and Jesse Jackson beg to differ.

Yes, and please let's not forget that one of the major plusses of the Obama candidacy was that he didn't have much of a voting record to worry about.

But I'm kind of wondering if we have reached a tipping point and people are truly fed up with having the same politicians maintaining the same policies and digging us further into the same hole. If we've reached that point, all bets are off...
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 10 queries.