Extra Armor Could Have Saved Many Lives, Study Shows (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 20, 2024, 04:16:34 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Extra Armor Could Have Saved Many Lives, Study Shows (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Extra Armor Could Have Saved Many Lives, Study Shows  (Read 3196 times)
Joe Republic
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,213
Ukraine


« on: January 06, 2006, 11:48:42 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.


And I see nothing in the article about Democrats having called for this body armor prior to this.  Source please.
Logged
Joe Republic
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,213
Ukraine


« Reply #1 on: January 08, 2006, 11:14:52 AM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.


And I see nothing in the article about Democrats having called for this body armor prior to this.  Source please.

Here's a Democrat from 2003. I'm sure there are plenty of others.

http://www.dailykos.com/comments/2003/11/1/84231/5664/28?mode=alone%3bshowrate=1#28

While that one anonymous Democrat from two 2.5 years ago did make a passing reference to it, frankly it's not enough for me.

In any case, did you read the part of the text that I quoted?  Who's to say that if the body armor had been used, there would have been more casualties instead?  I expect you'd be here arguing that sending the troops out to war with excessive armor caused increased inefficiency, which indirectly led to their deaths.  Which would also be the Republicans' fault.
Logged
Joe Republic
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,213
Ukraine


« Reply #2 on: January 09, 2006, 10:46:35 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.


And I see nothing in the article about Democrats having called for this body armor prior to this.  Source please.

Here's a Democrat from 2003. I'm sure there are plenty of others.

http://www.dailykos.com/comments/2003/11/1/84231/5664/28?mode=alone%3bshowrate=1#28

While that one anonymous Democrat from two 2.5 years ago did make a passing reference to it, frankly it's not enough for me.

In any case, did you read the part of the text that I quoted?  Who's to say that if the body armor had been used, there would have been more casualties instead?  I expect you'd be here arguing that sending the troops out to war with excessive armor caused increased inefficiency, which indirectly led to their deaths.  Which would also be the Republicans' fault.

Stupid Republican apoligist.

I'll take that to mean "Hmm, I guess I can't think of anything to counter that with."  My, you really are the worst debater I've ever encountered.

Oh, and as Blue Rectangle already pointed out, if you're going to over-use a word you could at least spell it correctly.
Logged
Joe Republic
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,213
Ukraine


« Reply #3 on: January 09, 2006, 10:52:22 PM »

Please do.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 11 queries.