Most and least moral posters

[Joe Republic]

If they were married, yes, it would be ok.  But most posters here aren't married.

We're talking about moral in a non-religious sense.  You can still be a very moral person, unmarried and not a virgin.

[Joe Republic]

Frodo

I think I remember reading one of Frodo's posts where he said he was bisexual.  I don't know if that's still true or not, but that would automatically put him out of the running.

Why?

[Joe Republic]

If they were married, yes, it would be ok.  But most posters here aren't married.

We're talking about moral in a non-religious sense.  You can still be a very moral person, unmarried and not a virgin.

Maybe if you had sex once or twice, and had reverted from your ways.  But if not, then no, absolutely not.  I'm sorry, but you can't be truly moral unless you abide by God's laws, or at least try to and accept Jesus as the son of god, and be saved.  Non-Religious Morality is an oxymoron.

I don't even want to get into this argument, I'm sick and tired of dealing with this "it's ok if he's done this or that, he can still be moral" bs.  So, whatever, stick with your beliefs.  If you live by them, see where you'll end up.  I've had enough.

Ok that's fine, then stop calling decent people 'immoral' because they don't fit your own ridiculously restrictive criteria.

[Joe Republic]

Why don't you go walk up to God right now and tell him his laws are ridiculas?  Just shoot and kill yourself and have a little chat with him at the gates of heaven about why his laws are so un-educated and outdated.

As much as I'm sure you'd love me to go and kill myself (I thought you were a Christian?), I'll refrain for now.

Also, I didn't say his laws were 'uneducated and outdated'.  But as you did, I'm guessing you inherently think they are.  You might want to look at that.

In any case, I said that the 'ridiculously restrictive criteria' for what's moral were yours, not God's.