I do see Rubio's strength as a candidate, but I'm not convinced that the boost he's been getting recently will stick. Rubio's been fashionable twice before in this primary season, and he faded both times.
The GOP Establishment has no real alternative to Trump. Rubio has shown some staying power and resiliency. Everyone else hasn't caught on, and I believe that the "No More Bushes" message is being received loud and clear.
It remains to be seen if Carly Fiorina has staying power. She's not really an "outsider", and she's the one "outsider" that the Establishment would be the most likely to make an accommodation with, but only for the VP level. This would all hinge, of course, on whether or not she shows some staying power; the attacks will be coming in three . . . two . . . one . . .
Right now, I think the GOP Establishment would like a Rubio-Fiorina ticket if they could make it work.
It appears I'm in the minority, but I am
not for Fiorina as VP for Rubio (or anyone for that matter). I was impressed by her first debate performance, but she has
problems written all over her.
She's articulate, but I agree with comments I have seen around the Internet that her seemingly impressive grasp on issues is born from rote memorization and nothing more. I don't believe she has a foundational understanding, appreciation, or passion for conservative policies. (I say this based almost solely on intuition, as I haven't really read anything about her political beliefs history.)
Also, her shoddy tenures at HP & Lucent (whether fairly critiqued or not) seem to be a source of permanent toxicity to her reputation.
And there is just an overall coldness to her. I don't see her being liked at all by the general electorate. Rather than her being the smartest and most obvious choice for Rubio (or the eventual nominee) to make, I think she is the most disastrous pick.
Plus, I imagine she ain't one Marco is too fond of. I could be wrong, but they don't seem to fit together.